首页> 外文学位 >Situated learning methodologies and assessment in civil engineering structures education.
【24h】

Situated learning methodologies and assessment in civil engineering structures education.

机译:土木工程结构教育中的情境学习方法和评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis describes an overarching study of civil engineering undergraduate structural education through student performance in recalling and applying basic structural engineering knowledge, and the viability of alternative situated learning environments for more effectively supporting the learning of this knowledge. To properly ground this study, a thorough investigation of related work in assessment, cognitive science, educational technology, and design education was completed, with connections and applications to civil engineering education highlighted. The experimental work of the thesis is organized into three parts: an assessment of civil engineering undergraduates' fundamental structural engineering knowledge and abilities; the development and testing of a software support environment for situated learning, the Civil Engineering Learning Library (CELL); and, the implementation and evaluation of the design studio, a pedagogical model for situated learning in the classroom. The results of the assessment study indicate that civil engineering seniors (and also students earlier in the curriculum) have difficulty retaining and applying basic knowledge of structural behavior, especially doing so in a flexible fashion in design situations. The survey also suggests that visualization plays an important role in understanding structural behavior. Tests with the CELL system show that a cognitively-flexible multimedia environment can support structural learning, but were inconclusive about whether the computer-based system helped the students to learn better than conventional classroom lecture. Two trial implementations of the design studio indicate that the studio model can serve as a powerful situated learning environment, and that it can be scaled up to reasonable class sizes. Significant requirements are associated with this model, however, primarily in faculty involvement, but also in physical resources and student time. In addition to these conclusions about the specific research efforts of this thesis, other more general observations of the difficulty of educational research (and particularly assessment) are discussed, especially in measuring the long-term effects of the desired learning influence. Finally, suggestions for improving these studies are offered, both for software environments and implementing other design studios, along with implications for future work.
机译:本文描述了土木工程专业本科生结构教育的总体研究,通过学生在回忆和应用基础结构工程知识方面的表现,以及替代性学习环境的可行性来更有效地支持该知识的学习。为了适当地进行这项研究,完成了对评估,认知科学,教育技术和设计教育相关工作的彻底调查,并着重指出了与土木工程教育的联系和应用。论文的实验工作分为三个部分:土木工程专业学生基础结构工程知识和能力的评估;土木工程学习库(CELL),用于现场学习的软件支持环境的开发和测试;设计工作室的实施和评估,这是一种用于课堂学习的教学模型。评估研究的结果表明,土木工程专业的高年级学生(以及课程中较早的学生)难以保留和应用结构行为的基本知识,尤其是在设计情况下以灵活的方式进行。调查还表明,可视化在理解结构行为方面起着重要作用。使用CELL系统进行的测试表明,认知灵活的多媒体环境可以支持结构学习,但是对于基于计算机的系统是否比传统的课堂讲授更能帮助学生学习,尚无定论。设计工作室的两个试用实施表明,工作室模型可以充当强大的现场学习环境,并且可以扩展到合理的班级规模。但是,与该模型相关的重要要求主要是在教师参与方面,还包括物理资源和学生时间。除了关于本论文的具体研究成果的这些结论之外,还讨论了对教育研究(尤其是评估)的难度的其他更一般性的观察,尤其是在测量所需学习影响的长期影响方面。最后,针对软件环境和实施其他设计工作室,提出了改进这些研究的建议,以及对未来工作的启示。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bertz, Michael Davis.;

  • 作者单位

    Georgia Institute of Technology.;

  • 授予单位 Georgia Institute of Technology.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.; Psychology Cognitive.; Education Technology.; Education Higher.; Education Sciences.; Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 501 p.
  • 总页数 501
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;心理学;高等教育;自然科学教育与普及;教育;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:34

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号