首页> 外文学位 >Influence of cardiovascular risk factors on remote ischemic preconditioning.
【24h】

Influence of cardiovascular risk factors on remote ischemic preconditioning.

机译:心血管危险因素对远程缺血预处理的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A powerful therapy against microvascular endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury is remote ischemic preconditioning (rIPC), which triggers tissue protection by exposing a limb to small cycles of vascular occlusion. Animal models indicate that CVD risk factors reduce the protective benefits of ischemic conditioning. However, there are no human studies investigating how a burden of risk factors interferes with rIPC to prevent endothelial injury. The purpose of the present study was to determine the influence of risk factor burden on the capacity of rIPC to prevent endothelial reperfusion injury in humans.;Twenty-two (age: 45+/-14 yr., BMI: 31+/-8 kg/m2) sedentary adults (12 lower burden: ≤2 risk factors; 10 raised burden: 3-5 risk factors) were studied. Digital arterial tonometry (EndoPAT 2000, Itamar Medical Inc.) was used to assess microvascular endothelial vasodilation during reactive hyperemia before and after 65 min of left arm reperfusion injury (20 min brachial artery ischemia followed by 45 min reperfusion) that was preceded by rIPC (right arm: 3X5 min ischemia/reperfusion). All subjects provided written informed consent according to the Internal Review Board guidelines at South Dakota State University.;Repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess group differences between the reactive hyperemia index (RHI) before and after reperfusion injury. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.;In lower burden subjects, rIPC was able to prevent endothelial reperfusion injury. The RHI following endothelial injury increased from baseline by 23% (from 2.1+/-0.4 to 2.5+/-0.5, P=0.072). In contrast, the RHI (baseline: 2.3+/-0.9) was significantly reduced by 25% despite induction of protection by rIPC (1.8+/-0.7) in the raised burden subjects (P=0.05). Between groups, the RHI after rIPC and endothelial injury was significantly different (P=0.008).;Microvascular endothelial injury was prevented when preceded by rIPC in the lower burden subjects. Remote IPC failed to protect against endothelial injury in the raised risk burden subjects. CVD risk factors appear to disrupt the protective properties of ischemic conditioning in humans.
机译:远程缺血预处理(rIPC)是一种针对微血管内皮缺血再灌注损伤的有效疗法,它可以通过使肢体暴露于小范围的血管闭塞来触发组织保护。动物模型表明,CVD危险因素会降低缺血性调理的保护作用。但是,目前尚无人类研究来研究风险因素的负担如何干扰rIPC预防内皮损伤。本研究的目的是确定危险因素负担对rIPC预防人类内皮再灌注损伤的能力的影响。22岁(年龄:45 +/- 14岁,BMI:31 +/- 8) kg / m2)久坐的成年人(12个较低的负担:≤2个危险因素; 10个增加的负担:3-5个危险因素)进行了研究。在左臂再灌注损伤65分钟(肱动脉缺血20分钟,再灌注45分钟)之前和之后,在反应性充血期间,使用数字动脉眼压计(EndoPAT 2000,Itamar Medical Inc.)评估微血管内皮舒张期,先进行rIPC(右臂:3X5分钟缺血/再灌注)。根据南达科他州立大学内部审查委员会的指南,所有受试者均提供了书面知情同意书;重复措施ANOVA用于评估再灌注损伤前后反应性充血指数(RHI)之间的组差异。统计学显着性设为P <0.05。在低负荷受试者中,rIPC能够预防内皮再灌注损伤。内皮损伤后的RHI较基线增加了23%(从2.1 +/- 0.4增至2.5 +/- 0.5,P = 0.072)。相反,尽管在负担增加的受试者中,尽管rIPC诱导了保护(1.8 +/- 0.7),但RHI(基线:2.3 +/- 0.9)仍​​显着降低了25%。各组之间,rIPC后的RHI与内皮损伤之间存在显着差异(P = 0.008)。在负担较轻的受试者中,先进行rIPC可以预防微血管内皮损伤。远程IPC未能在高风险人群中预防内皮损伤。 CVD危险因素似乎破坏了人体缺血性调理的保护特性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Trachte, Tiffany.;

  • 作者单位

    South Dakota State University.;

  • 授予单位 South Dakota State University.;
  • 学科 Physiology.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 79 p.
  • 总页数 79
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号