首页> 外文学位 >Discourse analysis of Retrospective Miscue Analysis sessions: Talking about the reading process with a fourth-grade reader.
【24h】

Discourse analysis of Retrospective Miscue Analysis sessions: Talking about the reading process with a fourth-grade reader.

机译:回顾性杂项分析会议的话语分析:与四年级的阅读者讨论阅读过程。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine the discourse of six selected Retrospective Miscue Analysis (RMA) session transcripts for effective and promising procedures, questions and discussion strategies. Data sources consisted of session transcripts and interviews to determine how the RMA team's discourse accomplished their intended purposes across six RMA sessions with a fourth grade reader. Phases of the analysis included (1) verifying the existing data sets, (2) selecting six RMA sessions from the set of eleven, (3) conducting and analyzing interviews with the RMA team, (4) structural analysis of sessions, (5) speech act analysis of discourse moves, (6) sequential analysis of question cycles, (7) categorization of patterns that emerged in the data. Three broad discourse themes, based on the RMA team's stated purposes for the RMA sessions, guided the categorization of team members' talk: (1) discourse moves providing revaluing, (2) discourse moves providing instruction, and (3) discourse moves encouraging the reader's strategy use.;The structural analysis of the RMA sessions generated elements of the instructional sequences and phases that made up each session, and a profile of RMA session procedures. Findings revealed: the RMA team used a wide range of question types to analyze miscues; discourse patterns involved in instruction and revaluing involved a variety of question cycles, position statement and 'you-statements' about the readers' reading strategies; problematic discourse sequences stemmed from problematic questions, responses and belief structures involved in interactions; by analyzing other readers in comparison with his own reading the reader's self-concept increased.
机译:这项研究的目的是检查六个选定的回顾性杂项分析(RMA)成绩单的论述,以了解有效和有前途的程序,问题和讨论策略。数据源包括会议记录和访谈,以确定RMA团队的话语如何在四年级RMA的六次会议上与四年级的读者达成其预定目的。分析的阶段包括(1)验证现有数据集;(2)从11个集合中选择6个RMA会话;(3)对RMA团队进行采访和分析;(4)会话的结构分析;(5)话语动作的言语行为分析,(6)问题周期的顺序分析,(7)数据中出现的模式分类。基于RMA团队在RMA会议上陈述的目的的三个广泛的演讲主题,指导了团队成员演讲的分类:(1)话语动作提供了重估;(2)话语动作提供了指导;以及(3)话语动作鼓励了RMA会话的结构分析生成了构成每个会话的教学顺序和阶段的元素,以及RMA会话过程的概况。结果发现:RMA团队使用了各种各样的问题类型来分析错误。指导和评估中的语篇模式涉及各种问题周期,立场陈述和关于读者阅读策略的“您陈述”;有问题的话语序列源于交互中涉及的有问题的问题,反应和信念结构;通过分析其他读者与自己阅读的比较,读者的自我概念得到了提高。

著录项

  • 作者

    Black, Wendy Lou.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Arizona.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Arizona.;
  • 学科 Reading instruction.;Elementary education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 312 p.
  • 总页数 312
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号