首页> 外文学位 >Modernity and morality: A study on the moral foundations of modern societies in the works of Durkheim, Weber, Foucault, Habermas and Kant (Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, Michel Foucault, Juergen Habermas, Immanuel Kant).
【24h】

Modernity and morality: A study on the moral foundations of modern societies in the works of Durkheim, Weber, Foucault, Habermas and Kant (Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, Michel Foucault, Juergen Habermas, Immanuel Kant).

机译:现代性与道德:在涂尔干,韦伯,福柯,哈贝马斯和康德的著作中研究了现代社会的道德基础(埃米尔·涂尔干,马克斯·韦伯,米歇尔·福柯,尤尔根·哈贝马斯,伊曼纽尔·康德)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The major theme of the dissertation concerns the moral aspect of modern social life in terms of the impact that the moral consciousness of individuals has on the formation and survival of a social order. It is a crucial contention of the work that the modern phenomenon of morality has been remarkably neglected in contemporary sociology resulting in a serious curtailment of the scope and relevance of the discipline and, as a consequence, in a widespread perception of its devaluation in the last decades. Thus the aim pursued here in delineating the moral condition of modern societies is to advocate for sociology a role in public debates as a critical and valid enterprise.; Part I begins by examining the work of Durkheim and his conception of society as fundamentally involved in the normative justification of sociology. It concludes that the Durkheimian tradition, which has underpinned the sociological outlook, has led to the undermining of the relevance of a distinct sociological analysis of morality. Accordingly, the subjective meaning of morality is derived from the internalization of the externally given and socially sanctioned rules of conduct. Correspondingly, individuals are conceived as entirely passive recipients of strategic planning or as imposed upon by some particular dominant groups in society or by society in general. The subsequent analysis of Weber's interpretive perspective shows that there is an inconsistency between his sociological view, predicated on the individuals' subjective meaning and motivation, and his account of the moral condition of rationalization in modern societies. It will be argued that, contrary to the current consensus among sociologists, Weber's analysis of modernity entails a conception of the human condition in which the individuals' are substantially deprived of the capacity for genuinely active and autonomous social action. Foucault and Habermas works, studied in the remainder of Part One, constitute two prominent contemporary attempts to obviate the moral lacuna which characterizes the prevalent sociological view of modernity. It will be maintained that, despite insisting on the crucial significance of morality, their analyses of modern societies come short of articulating historically pertinent and deductively sound explanation of the origin and endurance of the modern social order.; In Part II, Kant's idea of morality is invoked both as a major point of reference for and, at the same time, as an alternative view to, classical and contemporary sociological theories. Kant's insistence on autonomy as the moral endowment of human beings shows convincingly that we should ground the normative validity of the social mores and rules of conduct on the universal principles of morality adopted by each individual as the determining basis of her action. This allows us to redeem both the theoretical relevance of the sociological understanding of morality, and at the same time the critical vocation of our sociological endeavour, grounded in the dignity and the value of humanity inferred by Kant from the individual's capacity for freedom and the autonomy and from their ability of rational self-determination. In the concluding chapter it is suggested that the analyses carried on by the sociologists on the moral condition of modernity can be re-inscribed within the framework of the Kantian model of moral inquiry.
机译:论文的主题涉及现代社会生活的道德方面,即个人的道德意识对社会秩序的形成和生存的影响。作品的一个关键论点是,现代社会学中对现代道德现象的忽视已被当代社会学所忽视,从而严重削弱了该学科的范围和相关性,并因此导致人们普遍认识到该学科在最后一次贬值。几十年。因此,这里描述现代社会道德状况的目的是倡导社会学在公众辩论中作为重要和有效的企业发挥作用。第一部分从研究涂尔干的工作和他的社会概念开始,这些概念从根本上参与了社会学的规范论证。结论是,支持社会学观点的涂尔干主义传统导致破坏了对道德的独特社会学分析的相关性。因此,道德的主观含义是从外部给予的和社会认可的行为规则的内在化中得出的。相应地,个人被认为是战略计划的完全被动接受者,或被社会中某些特定的优势集团或整个社会强加于个人。随后对韦伯的解释性观点的分析表明,在以个人的主观含义和动机为基础的他的社会学观点与他对现代社会中合理化的道德条件的解释之间存在矛盾。有人认为,与社会学家当前的共识相反,韦伯对现代性的分析需要一种人类状况的概念,在这种状况下,个人被剥夺了真正主动和自主的社会行动的能力。在第一部分的其余部分中研究的福柯和哈贝马斯的作品,构成了两次当代的重要尝试,以消除道德上的不足,而道德上的不足代表了普遍的现代社会学观点。可以坚持的是,尽管坚持道德的至关重要性,但他们对现代社会的分析却缺乏对现代社会秩序的起源和耐久力进行历史性的,演绎性的解释。在第二部分中,引用了康德的道德观念,将其作为古典和当代社会学理论的主要参考点,同时又作为对古典和当代社会学理论的另一种观点。康德坚持将自治作为人类的道德end赋,这令人信服地表明,我们应该基于每个人所采用的普遍道德原则作为其行为的决定性基础,来规范社会道德规范和行为准则。这使我们既可以赎回社会学上对道德的理解的理论相关性,又可以赎回我们的社会学努力的关键使命,其基础是康德从个人的自由能力和自主权推断出的尊严和人道价值以及他们理性自决的能力。在最后一章中,建议可以在康德式的道德探究模型的框架内重新记录社会学家对现代性道德条件的分析。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rahbari, Mohammadreza.;

  • 作者单位

    York University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 York University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Sociology Theory and Methods.; Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 322 p.
  • 总页数 322
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会学理论与方法论;哲学理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:51

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号