首页> 外文学位 >Comparing public and private sector organizations: Cash investment practices.
【24h】

Comparing public and private sector organizations: Cash investment practices.

机译:比较公共和私营部门组织:现金投资做法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There is a theoretical debate concerning the differences between public and private sector organizations. This debate between the proponents and opponents of the argument that public and private sector organizations are alike has sprung up two opposing schools of thoughts.More than a few scholars, professionals, and administrators have argued that public sector organizations and private sector organizations are inherently different. Others contend that a careful consideration of public and private sector organizations will reveal that similarities outweigh differences. Yet, despite the abundance of literature on the subject of public and private sector differences and similarities, the matter has not been conclusively resolved.This study introduces empirical evidence into the theoretical debate on public and private sector dichotomy. The aim of the study is to look into a basic financial function, such as cash management, which is practiced in both public and private sector organizations, and determine whether there exist some distinctive features in cash management practices that indicate that public and private sector organizations operate differently. This study provides the findings accumulated in a survey of cash investment managers in both public and private sectors. Contingency tables were used as a method of organizing and analyzing categorical data. The chi-square, which is most commonly reported for nonparametric statistical model, is also presented.The results indicate that public sector cash managers are less sensitive to market pressures, are more sensitive to politics, laws and regulations in cash investment decisions as compared to private sector cash managers. The results also indicate that public sector managers are more risk averse and assess risk differently than their counterpart in the private sector.
机译:关于公共和私营部门组织之间的差异,存在着理论上的争论。支持者和反对者之间关于公共和私营部门组织相同的观点的辩论激起了两种相反的思想流派。不少学者,专业人士和管理者认为公共部门组织和私营部门组织在本质上是不同的。其他人则认为,对公共和私营部门组织的认真考虑将揭示出相似之处大于差异。然而,尽管关于公共和私营部门差异和相似性的文献很多,但该问题尚未得到最终解决。本研究将经验证据引入了关于公共和私营部门二分法的理论辩论。该研究的目的是研究基本的财务功能,例如在公共和私营部门组织中都实行的现金管理,并确定现金管理实践中是否存在一些表明公共和私营部门组织的独特特征。操作方式有所不同。这项研究提供了对公共部门和私营部门的现金投资经理进行的调查中积累的发现。列联表用作组织和分析分类数据的方法。还介绍了非参数统计模型中最常报告的卡方。结果表明,与之相比,公共部门现金经理对市场压力的敏感度较小,对政治,法律和法规的敏感度更高。私营部门现金经理。结果还表明,与私营部门的管理人员相比,公共部门的管理人员对风险的规避性更高,对风险的评估方式也有所不同。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bogui, Frederic Bragahi.;

  • 作者单位

    Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - Newark.;

  • 授予单位 Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - Newark.;
  • 学科 Economics Finance.Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 179 p.
  • 总页数 179
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号