首页> 外文学位 >Bootstrap strategies for variance component estimation: Theoretical and empirical results.
【24h】

Bootstrap strategies for variance component estimation: Theoretical and empirical results.

机译:用于方差分量估计的自举策略:理论和经验结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examined strategies for carrying out bootstrap estimation of variance components generated by random effects models. Prior studies (Brennan et al., 1987; Othman, 1995; Luecht & Smith, 1989) have tested a variety of bootstrap resampling strategies (such as resampling persons, resampling items, or simultaneously resampling persons and items) for variance component estimation. Each of these studies reported widely divergent estimates across the different bootstrap strategies.; This study takes an analytic approach toward (1) describing the bias in variance component estimates resulting from different strategies of bootstrap resampling, and (2) demonstrating the inappropriateness of specific strategies in certain contexts based the mechanism of bootstrap sampling. A set of principles is provided for guidance in selecting a specific bootstrap strategy for bootstrap variance component estimation. Results reported in previous studies are re-analyzed using bias adjustments based on the analytic approach. These widely divergent estimates actually converged upon adjustment.; A series of empirical simulation studies further examined the efficacy of the bias adjustments. Adjusted point estimates approached exact values more closely than their unadjusted counterparts in all cases regardless of design. Standard error and interval estimates followed patterns expected based on the mechanisms of bootstrap resampling. When applied to empirical performance assessment data from a 600 x 5 design, the adjustments produced a similar pattern of equivalence of estimates across bootstrap strategies.; The case is made that choice of bootstrap strategy should be carried out on a component-by-component basis. In general, resampling along the dimension(s) represented by the component of interest will give the most accurate standard error and interval estimates, except in the case of the residual component, which requires the additional resampling of estimated residuals. Recommendations are extended to complex designs (e.g. nested designs). Principles underlying the selection of a bootstrap strategy are recommended for applying the bootstrap to additional analytical contexts.
机译:这项研究检查了对随机效应模型产生的方差分量进行引导估计的策略。先前的研究(Brennan等,1987; Othman,1995; Luecht&Smith,1989)已经测试了各种自举重采样策略(例如对人员,项目进行重采样,或者同时对人员和项目进行重采样)以估计方差分量。这些研究中的每一项都报告了不同引导策略的估计差异很大。这项研究采用一种分析方法,针对(1)描述自举重采样的不同策略导致的方差分量估计的偏差,以及(2)基于自举采样的机制,说明在某些情况下特定策略的不适当性。提供了一组原则,以指导选择用于引导程序方差分量估计的特定引导程序策略。先前研究中报告的结果使用基于分析方法的偏倚调整进行了重新分析。这些差异很大的估计实际上是在调整后收敛的。一系列的经验模拟研究进一步检查了偏差调整的有效性。无论采用哪种设计,在所有情况下,调整点估计值都比未调整点更接近精确值。标准误差和间隔估计遵循基于引导重采样机制的预期模式。当将调整应用于600 x 5设计的经验绩效评估数据时,这些调整会产生相似的自举策略等效估计模式。提出了引导策略的选择应在逐个组件的基础上进行的情况。一般而言,除了残留分量的情况外,沿目标分量所代表的维度进行重采样将提供最准确的标准误差和区间估计,这需要对估计的残差进行额外的重采样。建议扩展到复杂的设计(例如嵌套设计)。建议将引导策略选择所依据的原则用于将引导应用于其他分析环境。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wiley, Edward William.;

  • 作者单位

    Stanford University.;

  • 授予单位 Stanford University.;
  • 学科 Psychology Psychometrics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 202 p.
  • 总页数 202
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 心理学研究方法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号