首页> 外文学位 >A Quantitative Study Examining the Differences in Motivation and Achievement between Traditional versus Team-Based Learning.
【24h】

A Quantitative Study Examining the Differences in Motivation and Achievement between Traditional versus Team-Based Learning.

机译:一项定量研究,考察了传统学习与基于团队的学习在动机和成就方面的差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Obtaining a degree from a community college could be the opportunity for students to advance their education or career. Nevertheless, nearly two-thirds of first-time community college students in the U.S. were required to take developmental mathematics courses. The problem was that approximately three-fourth of those students did not successfully complete a mathematics course at college level, despite the assistance and training in developmental courses. Therefore, the purpose of this quantitative, ex post facto study was to examine the differences in individual student motivation and achievement in developmental mathematics courses after incorporating team-based learning (TBL) strategy as opposed to traditional learning model (TLM). Invitations were sent to 120 students, who were enrolled in a three-hour credit developmental mathematics course in Fall 2015 at a community college in San Antonio, Texas. Forty-four results were analyzed, in which 21 were from the TLM group and 23 were from the TBL group. Participating professors completed the Teaching Style Inventory to determine their teaching style. Team-based professors incorporated the TBL activities once a week for four consecutive weeks. Participating students completed the Course Interest Survey, to assess their motivation reaction to specific instructional environment, and the ACCUPLACER Sample Questions, to measure their achievement before and after the treatment. The results of a one-way MANOVA showed that there was an overall significant main effect for learning environment, F(2, 41) = 3.98, p < 0.03. However, while there was no significant main effect for motivation, F(1, 42) = 0.1, p = 0.75, there was a significant main effect for achievement, F(1, 42) = 7.81, p = 0.008. Therefore, there was no significant difference in motivation; nevertheless, there was a significant difference in achievement. These results implied that the incorporation of the TBL strategy could be used to increase student achievement, but not motivation in mathematics courses. It was recommended that simple predesigned TBL activities be provided so that teachers and students may be more willing to implement and complete those activities. Moreover, future research should examine different types of TBL activities and components and their effectiveness on student motivation and achievement in mathematics classes.
机译:从社区大学获得学位可能是学生提高其学历或职业的机会。不过,在美国,将近三分之二的首次社区大学学生必须参加发展数学课程。问题是,尽管有发展课程的协助和培训,但大约有四分之三的学生未能成功完成大学水平的数学课程。因此,这项事后定量研究的目的是,在结合基于团队的学习(TBL)策略而非传统学习模型(TLM)之后,研究个人学生在发展数学课程中的动机和成就的差异。邀请函发送给了120名学生,这些学生于2015年秋季在德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥市的一所社区大学参加了为时3小时的学分发展数学课程。分析了44个结果,其中TLM组21个,TBL组23个。与会的教授填写了教学风格清单,以确定他们的教学风格。团队教授连续四个星期每周参加一次TBL活动。参与的学生完成了“课程兴趣调查”,以评估他们对特定教学环境的动力反应,以及“ ACCUPLACER样本问题”,以评估治疗前后的成绩。单向MANOVA的结果表明,学习环境总体上具有显着的主要影响,F(2,41)= 3.98,p <0.03。然而,虽然动机没有显着的主要影响,F(1,42)= 0.1,p = 0.75,但是成就有显着的主要影响,F(1,42)= 7.81,p = 0.008。因此,动机没有显着差异。但是,成就有很大的不同。这些结果表明,将TBL策略并入可以提高学生的学习成绩,但不能提高数学课程的学习动机。建议提供简单的预先设计的TBL活动,以便老师和学生可能更愿意实施和完成这些活动。此外,未来的研究应研究不同类型的TBL活动和组成部分及其在数学课程中对学生动机和成就的有效性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ku, James Yu-Fan.;

  • 作者单位

    Northcentral University.;

  • 授予单位 Northcentral University.;
  • 学科 Educational administration.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 177 p.
  • 总页数 177
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号