首页> 外文学位 >Salvaging the global neighbourhood: Multilateralism and public health challenges in a divided world.
【24h】

Salvaging the global neighbourhood: Multilateralism and public health challenges in a divided world.

机译:拯救全球邻国:分裂世界中的多边主义和公共卫生挑战。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The thesis predominantly uses the concept of “mutual vulnerability” to discuss the globalisation of diseases and health hazards in the emergent global neighbourhood. Because pathogens do not respect geo-political boundaries, this thesis argues that the world has become one single germ pool where there is no health sanctuary.; The concept of mutual vulnerability postulates that the irrelevance or obsolescence of national boundaries to microbial threats has created the capability to immerse all of humanity in a single microbial sea. It follows, therefore, that neither protectionism nor isolationism offers any effective defences against advancing microbial forces. As a result, the thesis argues that contemporary multilateral health initiatives should be driven primarily by enlightened self-interest as opposed to parochial protectionist policy.; This study is primarily situated within the discipline of international law. Nonetheless, it draws on the social sciences in its analysis of traditional medicine in Africa. It also makes overtures to medical historians in its discussion of the attitudes of societies to diseases and to the evolution of public health diplomacy, to international relations in its analysis of international regime theories, and to a number of other disciplines interested in the phenomenon of globalisation. This interdisciplinary framework for analysis offers a holistic approach to public health policy-making and scholarship to counter the segmented approaches of the present era. Thus, this thesis is concerned with four related projects.; First, it explores the relevance of legal interventions in the promotion and protection of public health. If health is a public good, legal interventions are indispensable intermediate strategies to deliver the final dividends of good health to the vulnerable and the poor in all societies.; Second, it explores multicultural approaches to health promotion and protection and argues for a humane health order based on multicultural inclusiveness and multi-stakeholder participation in health-policy making. Using African traditional malaria therapies as a case study, the thesis urges an animation of transnational civil society networks to evolve a humane health order, one that fulfils the desired vision of harmony and fairness.; Third, it makes an argument for increased collaboration among lawyers, epidemiologists and scholars of other disciplines related to public health. Using the tenets of health promotion and primary health care, the thesis urges an inter-disciplinary dialogue to facilitate the needed “epidemiological transition” across societies, especially in the developing world.; Fourth, the thesis makes modest proposals towards the reduction of unequal disease burdens within and among nation-states. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
机译:本文主要使用“相互脆弱性”的概念来讨论新兴的全球社区中疾病和健康危害的全球化。由于病原体不遵守地缘政治界限,因此本文认为,世界已成为一个没有卫生庇护所的单一细菌库。相互脆弱性的概念假定,国家边界与微生物威胁无关或已经过时,创造了将全人类沉浸在单一微生物海中的能力。因此,随之而来的是,保护主义和孤立主义都没有提供任何有效的防御手段来抵抗不断发展的微生物力量。结果,论文认为当代多边卫生倡议应主要由开明的自我利益驱动,而不是狭par的保护主义政策。这项研究主要位于国际法学科之内。尽管如此,它在分析非洲传统医学时还是借鉴了社会科学。它还在讨论社会对疾病和公共卫生外交的态度时对医学史家的建议,对国际制度理论的分析中对国际关系的关注,以及对全球化现象感兴趣的许多其他学科的建议。这种跨学科的分析框架为公共卫生政策制定和学术研究提供了一种整体方法,以应对当前时代的分割方法。因此,本文涉及四个相关项目。首先,它探讨了法律干预在促进和保护公共卫生中的相关性。如果健康是一种公共物品,则法律干预是必不可少的中间策略,旨在向所有社会中的弱势群体和穷人提供良好健康的最终红利。其次,它探讨了促进和保护健康的多元文化方法,并主张基于多元文化包容性和多方利益相关者参与卫生政策制定的人道健康秩序。本文以非洲传统疟疾疗法为例,敦促跨国公民社会网络的动画发展出一种人道的健康秩序,该秩序可以实现理想的和谐与公平观。第三,它提出了律师,流行病学家和其他与公共卫生相关学科的学者之间加强合作的观点。论文利用健康促进和初级卫生保健的原则,敦促开展跨学科对话,以促进整个社会,特别是在发展中国家,实现必要的“流行病学过渡”。第四,论文提出了减少民族国家内部和国家之间不平等疾病负担的适当建议。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)

著录项

  • 作者

    Aginam, Vitalis Obijiofor.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of British Columbia (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 The University of British Columbia (Canada).;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.; Health Sciences Public Health.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 247 p.
  • 总页数 247
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号