首页> 外文学位 >The case for geopolitics: Venice, Ottoman Empire, and Ming China.
【24h】

The case for geopolitics: Venice, Ottoman Empire, and Ming China.

机译:地缘政治的例子是:威尼斯,奥斯曼帝国和中国明朝。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation aims to revive the concept of geography in the study of international relations. I argue for the continued importance of geography in shaping the grand strategy of states. Specifically, I consider three geographical features: location of resources, layout of trade routes, and nature of state borders. These features, by constraining or creating opportunities for state action, define an underlying geopolitical reality.; I argue that states increase and maintain their relative power by pursuing a geostrategy that matches the underlying geopolitics. I demonstrate that when states expand their influence toward trade routes and resource-rich locations, while paying attention to their land borders, they succeed as great powers.; I illustrate my argument with three historical case studies: the Venetian empire from the 10th to the 16th century, the rise of the Ottoman empire from the 14th to the 17th century, and Ming China from the 14th to the 17 th century. These case studies cover roughly the same period in history characterized by the 15th century Portuguese and Spanish “discoverers” who, by exploring new routes between Europe and Asia, dramatically altered the geopolitical situation of the world. Given this geopolitical change, I examine the changes in geostrategy, or lack thereof, made by the three Eurasian powers.; The importance of this research project is twofold. First, from a theoretical perspective, it adds analytical and explanatory power to the literature of international relations theory. The resulting theory will be perhaps less parsimonious but more explanatory and attuned to the realities of the world. Second, this dissertation also bears on current foreign policies, reflecting the continued relevance of geography in international relations. For instance, I argue that the foreign policy of modern China, like that of Venice or the Ottoman Empire, is guided by its quest for resources and control over trade routes. Over the next few decades, China will direct its attention to controlling trade routes in either the Pacific Ocean or in Central Asia, depending on whether its land borders are threatened.
机译:本文旨在复兴国际关系研究中的地理学概念。我主张地理学在塑造国家大战略中的持续重要性。具体来说,我考虑了三个地理特征:资源的位置,贸易路线的布局以及国家边界的性质。这些特征通过限制国家行动或为国家行动创造机会,定义了潜在的地缘政治现实。我认为,国家通过追求与潜在地缘政治相匹配的地缘战略来增加和维持其相对权力。我证明,当国家在扩大贸易路线和资源丰富的地区的影响力的同时,注意其国​​土边界时,它们将成为大国。我通过三个历史案例研究来说明我的论点:从10世纪到16世纪的威尼斯帝国,从14世纪起的奥斯曼帝国的崛起至17 世纪,并将明朝中国从14 至17 世纪。这些案例研究涵盖了历史上大致相同的时期,其特征是15世纪的葡萄牙和西班牙“发现者”,他们通过探索欧洲和亚洲之间的新路线,极大地改变了世界的地缘政治状况。考虑到这种地缘政治的变化,我考察了三个欧亚大国所做的地缘战略的变化或没有变化。这个研究项目的重要性是双重的。首先,从理论的角度来看,它为国际关系理论的文献增加了分析和解释的能力。由此产生的理论也许不会那么简单,但会更具解释性,并与世界的现实相协调。其次,本文还涉及当前的外交政策,反映了地理学在国际关系中的持续重要性。例如,我认为现代中国的外交政策,如威尼斯或奥斯曼帝国的外交政策,是其对资源的追求和对贸易路线的控制。在接下来的几十年中,中国将根据控制陆地边界是否受到威胁,将注意力集中在控制太平洋或中亚的贸易路线上。

著录项

  • 作者

    Grygiel, Jakub Joachim.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton University.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton University.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 356 p.
  • 总页数 356
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号