首页> 外文学位 >The weight of objectivity: Critical social theory and theology.
【24h】

The weight of objectivity: Critical social theory and theology.

机译:客观性的分量:批判性社会理论和神学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis argues that Christian theology should incorporate social theory into its methodology if it hopes to bridge the gap between its theory and practice. If theological concepts and beliefs are to respond adequately to human need in contemporary society, then theologians must necessarily employ the methodology of the social sciences, despite the fact that this position implies the negation of theology as an independent, self-sufficient discipline.; The study begins by setting the problem under examination in its context within contemporary society. It demonstrates how what Hans Blumenberg calls human “self-assertion” began to challenge Western society's understanding of itself in relation to its cultural and religious traditions, as it emerged out of the Middle Ages. The resulting tensions between a respect for human freedom and a commitment to religious beliefs have remained largely unresolved in the “modern age.”; The subsequent three chapters explore different responses to this dilemma: the liberation theology of Juan Luis Segundo, the “radical orthodoxy” of John Milbank, and the use of religious discourse in the feminist theories of Luce Irigaray and Helene Cixous. The limitations identified in each of these positions demonstrate why theology must incorporate social theory into its methodology with greater clarity and consistency. The thesis concludes with an analysis of the (so-called) “Positivist Dispute” between Theodor W. Adorno and Karl Popper. This study serves to clarify the nature of “social theory” and to identify how its concerns intersect with those of theology. This examination of the debate over social scientific method, the concept of reason, the place of value judgements in science, serves to identify the implications of theology's use of social theory. It is concluded that such an incorporation of social scientific methodology results in the negation of theology as it has traditionally been understood, as it becomes an act of critical self-reflection on religious discourse, motivated by the “moral attitude” of alleviating human suffering, rather than an apologetic role. At the same time, it is shown that in this role, theological reflection retains a vital role in social theory, providing a way with which to talk about unrealized potentialities contained in social life.
机译:本文认为,如果基督教神学希望弥合其理论与实践之间的鸿沟,则应将社会理论纳入其方法论。如果神学的概念和信仰能够对当代社会中的人类需求做出充分的反应,那么神学家必须采用社会科学的方法论,尽管事实上,这一立场暗示着对神学的否定是一门独立的,自给自足的学科。该研究首先在当代社会中根据问题来研究问题。它展示了汉斯·布鲁门伯格(Hans Blumenberg)所说的人类“自信心”是如何开始挑战西方社会自中世纪以来就与其文化和宗教传统有关的自我理解的。在“现代时代”,在尊重人的自由与对宗教信仰的承诺之间产生的紧张关系基本上没有得到解决。随后的三章探讨了对这一困境的不同回应:胡安·路易斯·塞贡多(Juan Luis Segundo)的解放神学,约翰·米尔班克(John Milbank)的“激进正统派”,以及卢斯·伊里加里(Luce Irigaray)和海伦·希克斯(Helene Cixous)的女性主义理论中宗教话语的使用。这些立场所确定的局限性说明了为什么神学必须以更加清晰和一致的方式将社会理论纳入其方法论中。本文的结尾是对西奥多·W·阿多诺(Theodor W. Adorno)和卡尔·波普尔(Karl Popper)之间的(所谓的)“实证主义争端”的分析。这项研究旨在阐明“社会理论”的本质,并确定其关注点与神学关注点如何相交。对社会科学方法,理性概念,价值判断在科学中的地位的争论的这种考察,有助于确定神学对社会理论的运用的含义。结论是,社会科学方法论的这种融合导致了对神学的否定,这是传统上被理解的,因为它成为减轻宗教信仰话语的批判性自我反思的行为,其动机是减轻人们痛苦的“道德态度”,而不是道歉角色。同时表明,在这一角色中,神学反思在社会理论中仍然扮演着至关重要的角色,为讨论社会生活中未实现的潜力提供了一种途径。

著录项

  • 作者

    Brittain, Chrisopher Craig.;

  • 作者单位

    University of St. Michael's College (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of St. Michael's College (Canada).;
  • 学科 Theology.; Sociology Theory and Methods.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 338 p.
  • 总页数 338
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教 ; 社会学理论与方法论 ;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号