首页> 外文学位 >The debates between Daoists and Buddhists in the early Tang and the Chongxuan teaching of Daoism: A study of Daoxuans Ji gujin Fo Dao lunheng (T 2104) (German text, China).
【24h】

The debates between Daoists and Buddhists in the early Tang and the Chongxuan teaching of Daoism: A study of Daoxuans Ji gujin Fo Dao lunheng (T 2104) (German text, China).

机译:唐初佛教徒与佛教徒之间的争论和道教的崇宣教义:《道教纪古今佛道伦亨》(T 2104)研究(德文,中国)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Subject of the thesis are the debates between Buddhists and Daoists at the court of the early Tang described in Daoxuans Ji gujin Fo Dao lunheng, T 2104, 3–4.; We present an annotated translation of nine debates with an introduction into the institutional and historical background.; Subjects of research: (1) Formal aspects and regulations of the court debates. With the information about the rules and regulations of the court debates translated it was possible to reconstruct an outline of the regular proceedings of an interreligious court debate. (2) Conventions of rhetoric. Buddhism introduced into China some of the conventions of debate developed in India. We introduce some of the texts translated into Chinese that deal with these conventions. The analysis of the debates shows that the Buddhists were familiar with these texts.; We analyze rhetoric and logic in the debates: yinming logic, the logic of reductio ad absurdum, the prasanga method introduced into China with Madhyamika-Buddhism, the use of analogy and the use of quotations. (3) Chongxuanxue and Court Daoism. The Daoists participants in the debates can be considered representatives of the ‘chongxuanxue’.; The development of chongxuanxue is analyzed as part of the formation of ‘Gentry-’ or ‘Court-Daoism’, considering its role in integrating Daoism, its function in the context of inner-Daoist conflicts as well as in the confrontation with Buddhism in the environment of the gentry and the court.; The analysis covers not only the issue of the introduction of the philosophical method of the logic of the tetra lemma into the interpretation of the Laozi, but also the role of the chongxuan interpretation for the introduction of Mahayanistic sotenological notions of salvation through understanding into the reading of the Laozi—thus proving that those soteriological notions were always part of Daoism.
机译:论文的主题是唐玄初的佛教徒与道士之间的辩论,见《道玄纪古今佛道伦亨》,T 2104,3-4。我们提供了9场辩论的带注释的译文,并介绍了制度和历史背景。研究主题:(1)法院辩论的正式方面和规定。借助翻译后的有关法院辩论规则和法规的信息,可以重建宗教间法庭辩论的常规程序的提要。 (2)修辞公约。佛教向中国引入了印度发展的一些辩论公约。我们介绍一些处理这些约定的翻译成中文的文本。对辩论的分析表明,佛教徒们熟悉这些经文。我们在辩论中分析了修辞学和逻辑: yinming 逻辑, reducio ad abdurdum 的逻辑,通过伊斯兰教法传入中国的 prasanga 方法,使用类比和使用引号。 (3)崇玄学与道教。参加辩论的道教参加者可以被视为“ 崇选学”的代表。考虑到“玄玄学”在整合道教中的作用,其在内部道教冲突中的功能以及“道教”或“法院道教”形成的一部分,对“斜玄”的发展进行了分析。在士绅和朝廷环境中与佛教对抗。该分析不仅涵盖将四极引理逻辑的哲学方法引入到老子的解释中的问题,而且还涵盖了崇宣解释在通过理解到阅读中引入救赎的马哈亚主义社会学概念中的作用。老子的故事-从而证明了这些社会学观念始终是道教的一部分。

著录项

  • 作者

    Assandri, Friederike.;

  • 作者单位

    Ruprecht-Karls-Universitaet Heidelberg (Germany).;

  • 授予单位 Ruprecht-Karls-Universitaet Heidelberg (Germany).;
  • 学科 Religion History of.; History Asia Australia and Oceania.; Religion Philosophy of.
  • 学位 Dr.Phil.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 712 p.
  • 总页数 712
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教史、宗教地理;世界史;宗教理论、宗教思想;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:16

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号