首页> 外文学位 >Dementia-Alzheimer's type identified in three diagnostic modalities.
【24h】

Dementia-Alzheimer's type identified in three diagnostic modalities.

机译:痴呆-阿尔茨海默氏病的类型可通过三种诊断方式确定。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The problem. The purpose of this study was to compare results of three clinical diagnostic modalities for patients suspected of having Dementia Alzheimer's type (DAT). The study investigated for positive correlation, or rates of agreement, among neurology, nuclear medicine's single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) imaging, and neuropsychological assessments, in order to provide data on the need for multimodal diagnostic approaches in the clinical setting.; Method. Diagnostic impressions were completed without knowledge of the results of the other two modalities. A review was made of the diagnostic impressions of neurology, SPECT scans, and neuropsychological assessments, for all 20 subjects in the study. Their rates of agreement were observed for selected clinical issues, such as primary diagnosis, laterality with right- or left-hemisphere involvement, or bilateral-diffuse findings.; Results. Results of the study suggest moderate rates of agreement between SPECT scans and other modalities in the area of primary diagnosis. Levels of confidence were somewhat higher when all three modalities were used in the clinical setting. Lower rates of agreement were observed with regard to lateral versus bilateral findings. SPECT scans endorsed the highest number of lateral findings, but not as have been observed in earlier studies. Findings were classified as bilateral with greater involvement on one side or the other, rather than right or left hemisphere. This may be due to the rapidly increasing quality of neuroimaging in the past several years. Neurology and neuropsychological findings suggested right or left, by implication and inference, from selected test results. However, the rate of agreement with SPECT was not high. The unexpected finding was the significant degree of agreement endorsing frontal lobe involvement.
机译:问题。这项研究的目的是比较怀疑患有阿尔茨海默氏病(DAT)的三种临床诊断方法的结果。该研究调查了神经病学,核医学的单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)成像和神经心理学评估之间的正相关性或一致性,以提供有关临床环境中需要多模式诊断方法的数据。方法。诊断印象是在不了解其他两种方式的结果的情况下完成的。对研究中所有20位受试者的神经学,SPECT扫描和神经心理评估的诊断印象进行了回顾。对于某些临床问题,例如初步诊断,右半球或左半球受累的偏侧性或双侧弥漫性发现,观察到他们的同意率。结果。研究结果表明,在原发性诊断领域,SPECT扫描与其他方式之间的符合率中等。当在临床环境中使用所有三种方式时,置信度会更高。观察到侧向和双侧发现的一致性较低。 SPECT扫描支持最多的侧向发现,但不像早期研究中观察到的那样。研究结果被归类为双侧,一侧或另一侧参与程度更高,而不是右半球或左半球。这可能是由于过去几年中神经成像质量的快速提高。神经病学和神经心理学的发现暗示和推论是从选定的测试结果中得出的正确或错误。但是,与SPECT的协议率不高。意外的发现是同意额叶受累的协议程度很高。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dwyer, Philip Matthew.;

  • 作者单位

    Alliant International University, San Diego.;

  • 授予单位 Alliant International University, San Diego.;
  • 学科 Psychology Clinical.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 151 p.
  • 总页数 151
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医学心理学、病理心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号