首页> 外文学位 >The interactional and organizational work of prosody in classroom discourse activities.
【24h】

The interactional and organizational work of prosody in classroom discourse activities.

机译:课堂话语活动中韵律的互动和组织工作。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the prosodic packaging of the IRF exchange (Sinclair & Coulthard, 1975; Mehan, 1979; Mercer, 1995; Nassaji & Wells, 2000) as it occurs in two discourse activities in the talk-in-interaction in a public high school. Using methods of discovery which see language as an interactive, dynamic and embodied process (Hopper, 1998; Goodwin, 1981; Schegloff, 1996b) auditory and acoustic analyses are undertaken focusing on the role that prosody plays in implementing educational functions or activities (Levinson, 1992; Selting, 1996) in the classroom.; The analysis shows that the prosodic phenomena of pitch level, pitch contour, speech rate, and rhythm are used systematically by students and teachers as part of the embodiment of classroom discourse activities. Two distinct classroom discourse activities, the review-evaluation discourse activity (REDA) and the quiz game activity (QGA) are characterized, in part, by their distinct prosodic embodiment. REDAs are characterized by high-pitched teacher initiation moves, mid pitch level student responses, and a slower rate of speech for teachers. The prosody of teacher initiation and student response moves in QGAs is systematically different from those moves in the REDAs. The analysis also shows interesting prosodic patterning correlating with the correctness of student responses and positive or negative assessments of those responses by the teacher. A single-case analysis of one class period shows the role of prosody as an organizing device in a teacher's series of questions. A series of IRF exchanges is seen to be prosodically organized in a paratone. A 'wh' question within a specific sequential environment (the third move of the IRF exchange, labeled an evidence question) and embodied in a consistent pitch contour is seen to have interactional significance as a question which moves a more rigid series of IRF exchanges into more interactive discourse.; The investigation's empirical evidence supports an interaction-based theory of prosody in English (Brazil, 1997; Couper-Kuhlen, 1993; Couper-Kuhlen & Selting, 1996; Auer, Couper-Kuhlen, & Muller, 1999) by collecting baseline prosodic evidence for a theory of practice in classroom discourse (Mercer, 1995) and addressing issues such as the sound production of teacher and student roles, and student agency in classroom discourse.
机译:本文研究了IRF交流的韵律性包装(Sinclair&Coulthard,1975; Mehan,1979; Mercer,1995; Nassaji&Wells,2000),它发生在公立高中互动对话中的两种话语活动中。 。使用将语言视为互动,动态和体现的过程的发现方法(Hopper,1998; Goodwin,1981; Schegloff,1996b),听觉和声学分析着重于韵律在实现教育功能或活动中的作用(Levinson, 1992; Selting,1996)。分析表明,音调水平,音调轮廓,语速和节奏的韵律现象被学生和教师系统地用作课堂话语活动的一部分。两种截然不同的课堂话语活动,即复习评价话语活动(REDA)和测验游戏活动(QGA),其部分特点是其独特的韵律体现。 REDA的特点是教师发声高调,学生反应中等,教师讲话速度较慢。 QGA中教师启蒙和学生反应动作的韵律与REDA中的动作系统地不同。分析还显示出有趣的韵律模式,与学生回答的正确性以及老师对这些回答的正面或负面评估相关。对一个班级的单例分析表明,韵律在教师的一系列问题中作为组织工具的作用。一系列的IRF交流被视为是对调的。在特定顺序环境(IRF交换的第三步,标记为证据问题)中并以一致的音高轮廓体现的“ wh”问题被视为具有交互意义,因为该问题将一系列更严格的IRF交换移入更具互动性的论述。该调查的经验证据通过收集基础韵律证据来支持英语中基于互动的韵律理论(巴西,1997;库珀-库伦,1993;库珀-库伦和塞尔廷,1996; Auer,库珀-库伦和穆勒,1999)。一种课堂话语实践理论(Mercer,1995年),并解决了诸如教师和学生角色的健全产生以及课堂话语中的学生代理等问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hellermann, John Karl.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Language Linguistics.; Sociology General.; Education Secondary.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 225 p.
  • 总页数 225
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 语言学;社会学;中等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号