首页> 外文学位 >Teacher unions in public schools: Insights for social organization and student achievement.
【24h】

Teacher unions in public schools: Insights for social organization and student achievement.

机译:公立学校的教师工会:社会组织和学生成就的见解。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Teacher unions are a relatively recent phenomenon in the United States, tracing their collective bargaining origins back only to the early 1960s. However, the two largest unions, the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers, now claim millions of members and wield considerable political influence. It is puzzling why so few scholars have scrutinized whether teacher unions shape different aspects of school environments, and ultimately the academic performance of students. I used data from the National Education Longitudinal Study (NELS) and the Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS) to examine whether a union presence affected P--12 teachers, principals, and the larger school environment. I employed multivariate regression techniques whenever possible to isolate the effects of teacher unionism from those of confounding variables. My findings suggest that unionized and nonunionized schools differ on important dimensions of social organization. In particular, unionized teachers reported more autonomy in the classroom, greater influence over school policy, and more job satisfaction than nonunionized counterparts. In contrast, unionized teachers reported less teacher collaboration, and judged their principals to be less effective leaders. Notably, unionism did not appear to raise the level of conflict between principals and teachers. In sum, teacher unionism was linked to increased teacher empowerment and job satisfaction, decreased hierarchical monitoring of teachers, and decreased vertical and horizontal communication in schools. In the second part of my dissertation, I found that teacher unionism was not related to lower student achievement (math, reading, science, or history) between the eighth and tenth grades. Further, the social organizational differences between unionized and nonunionized schools did little to mediate the effects of unionism on student achievement. This study has implications for organizational theory and behavior, as well as our understanding of school systems and educational reform.
机译:在美国,教师工会是一种相对较新的现象,其集体谈判起源可追溯至1960年代初。但是,两个最大的工会,即国家教育协会和美国教师联合会,现在拥有数百万名成员,并具有相当大的政治影响力。令人困惑的是,为什么很少有学者审查教师工会是否影响学校环境的不同方面,并最终影响学生的学习成绩。我使用了来自国家教育纵向研究(NELS)和学校和人员配备调查(SASS)的数据,以检查工会的存在是否影响了P--12的教师,校长和更大的学校环境。我尽可能使用多元回归技术来将教师工会的影响与混杂变量的影响隔离开。我的发现表明,工会学校和非工会学校在社会组织的重要方面存在差异。特别是,与非工会教师相比,工会教师报告了课堂上的自主性更高,对学校政策的影响更大,工作满意度更高。相比之下,工会教师报告的教师合作较少,并认为校长的领导效率较低。值得注意的是,工会主义似乎并未提高校长与教师之间的冲突程度。总而言之,教师工会主义与提高教师的权能和工作满意度,减少对教师的分级监督以及减少学校的纵向和横向沟通有关。在我的论文的第二部分中,我发现在八年级和十年级之间,教师工会主义与较低的学生成绩(数学,阅读,科学或历史)无关。此外,工会学校和非工会学校之间的社会组织差异对调解工会主义对学生成绩的影响几乎没有作用。这项研究对组织理论和行为,以及我们对学校制度和教育改革的理解都有影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Carini, Robert M.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana University.;
  • 学科 Education Sociology of.;Sociology Industrial and Labor Relations.;Education Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 269 p.
  • 总页数 269
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号