首页> 外文学位 >An exploration of the leadership style preferences among African American women administrators of the 1890 Cooperative Extension System.
【24h】

An exploration of the leadership style preferences among African American women administrators of the 1890 Cooperative Extension System.

机译:探索1890年合作社扩展系统的非洲裔美国女性管理者中的领导风格偏好。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to identify and explore the leadership style preferences among current African American Administrators of the 1890 Land-Grant Cooperative Extension system. The population used in this study was African American women administrators from eighteen mostly southern states. The researcher used a "two-phase model" (Creswell, 2005, p. 516), in which data was collected in two stages. Relationships between personal, professional characteristics, and leadership style preferences were examined. In Stage I of the study, 18 study participants completed two standard survey instruments, the Bass and Avolio (2000b) developed Multi-Factor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ), which measures three leadership styles and the Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI) developed by Kouzes, J., & Posner, B. (1997), which measures the five practices of exemplary leadership framework and a researcher developed demographic questionnaire, which was used to collect participant personal and professional demographic characteristics. Quantitative research data was entered and analyzed using Minitab for Windows version 14.0. The researcher calculated both descriptive and correlation statistics to meet the research objectives. Correlation between summative scores of the LPI-SELF and MLQ and personal, professional characteristics were also calculated and charted to output accordingly. The regression analyses of both surveys revealed the institution location had a strong influence on the participants' transformational leadership style preferences. Results of the MLQ analysis suggested that the state served as a strong predator that the participants exhibited transformational leadership styles, due to leadership style accounting for over half of the constructs' statistical variance. To further clarify participant's leadership style preferences, Stage 2 of the study involved conducting telephone interviews with 4 of the study participants. Interview responses were entered into Nvivo8 qualitative software, which helped to chart, organize, and code data to easily analyze like concepts and responses. Multiple regression was used to examine statistical relationships between participants' leadership characteristics and demographic characteristics. Participants reported engaging in transformational leadership more often than transactional leadership. Although there was a statistical significance within the LPI constructs, the location of the institution was not a strong predictor of participants that exhibited the five practices of leadership as outlined by Kouzes and Posner (1997).
机译:这项混合方法研究的目的是确定并探索1890年土地授予合作社扩展系统的现任非洲裔美国管理人员中的领导风格偏好。本研究使用的人群是来自十八个主要是南部州的非洲裔美国女性管理人员。研究人员使用了“两阶段模型”(Creswell,2005年,第516页),其中数据分两个阶段收集。研究了个人,职业特征和领导风格偏好之间的关系。在研究的第一阶段,有18名研究参与者完成了两种标准的调查工具,即Bass和Avolio(2000b)制定的“多因素领导问卷”(MLQ),用于衡量三种领导风格和由库兹斯(Kouzes)制定的领导实践清单(LPI) J.,&Posner,B.(1997),该模型测量了示例性领导框架的五种实践,研究人员开发了人口统计学调查表,该调查表用于收集参与者的个人和专业人口统计学特征。使用适用于Windows版本14.0的Minitab输入和分析定量研究数据。研究人员计算了描述性统计数据和相关统计数据,以达到研究目的。 LPI-SELF和MLQ的总分与个人,专业特征之间的相关性也经过计算并绘制成图表以进行相应输出。两项调查的回归分析表明,机构位置对参与者的变革型领导风格偏好有很大影响。 MLQ分析的结果表明,该州是参与者表现出变革型领导风格的强力捕食者,这是因为领导风格占据了结构统计差异的一半以上。为了进一步阐明参与者对领导风格的偏爱,研究的第二阶段包括与其中四名参与者进行电话访谈。面试回答被输入到Nvivo8定性软件中,该软件帮助绘制图表,组织和编码数据,以轻松分析类似的概念和回答。多元回归被用来检验参与者的领导特征和人口特征之间的统计关系。参与者报告说,参与变革型领导的频率要高于交易型领导。尽管LPI结构内部具有统计意义,但是机构的位置并不是参与者的有力预测指标,因为参与者展示了Kouzes和Posner(1997)概述的五种领导实践。

著录项

  • 作者

    Campbell, Shelvy L.;

  • 作者单位

    Capella University.;

  • 授予单位 Capella University.;
  • 学科 Education Higher Education Administration.;Education Higher.;Womens Studies.;Education Leadership.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 152 p.
  • 总页数 152
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号