首页> 外文学位 >Apatheia and Atonement: Grammar of Salvation for Contemporary Christian Theology.
【24h】

Apatheia and Atonement: Grammar of Salvation for Contemporary Christian Theology.

机译:冷漠与赎罪:当代基督教神学的救赎语法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I propose to study the axiomatic significance of apatheia (divine impassibility) in contemporary Christian understanding of atonement. The claim that God suffers, an anathema for centuries, is commonplace in many contemporary theologies. In the face of the human suffering witnessed in the bloodiest century, God's apatheia as held by the great fathers and doctors of the church seems both immoral and unscriptural to modern Christians. As Western thinkers reject the patristic concept of divine impassibility and immutability as a Hellenistic contamination, East-Asian theologians such as Kazoh Kitamori and Andrew Park also attempt to contextualize the gospel based on divine pathos (suffering). Kitamori's "theology of pain" attempts to reconstruct Luther's theology of cross with the Japanese traditional ethos of tsurasa (pain). Park's "theology of han (deep wound)" makes a radical claim that God's han relieves human han, as he incorporates the insights of Process Theology through his Korean experience.;Against the widespread contemporary rejection of the classical axiom of divine impassibility, this dissertation contends that the patristic articulation of apatheia is indispensable to express a holistic salvation of Christ's redemptive life and work. At stake is the theological grammar of salvation: to posit that God is a passible God in order to assuage human suffering would not only undermine a true understanding of God, but also distort the mystery and integrity of the Incarnation. Among many patristic theologians who uphold apatheia as apophatic (negative) qualification of God's perfect affections, Cyril of Alexandria augments it to be the ontological and soteriological certitude for divine agape. Cyril's mia (one subject) Christology construes the transformative redemption of sinners in the person of the incarnate Word whose "impassible suffering" not only undoes the effects of the fall but also restores humanity to God's original intention of eternal communion. Contrary to simplistic modern misunderstanding of apatheia, divine impassibility deepens our understanding of God's unconditioned love and its transformative power with a greater hope that divine healing will lead us to participate in his divine nature.
机译:我建议研究在现代基督徒对赎罪的理解中,无语症(神的不可逾越)的公理意义。在许多当代神学中,声称上帝遭受痛苦,长达数世纪的痛苦是司空见惯的。面对最血腥的世纪所遭受的人类苦难,教会的伟大父亲和医生所持有的上帝的冷漠对现代基督徒而言既是不道德的,也是无言的。由于西方思想家拒绝将希腊人的不可逾越和不变性作为希腊化污染的崇高观念,所以东亚神学家,例如卡佐赫·北森和安德鲁·帕克,也试图根据神圣的悲痛将福音背景化。北森的“痛苦神学”试图用日本传统的tsurasa(痛苦)精神重建路德的十字架神学。朴的“汉神学”(深伤口)提出了一个激进的主张,即神汉通过他的韩国经验融合了过程神学的见解,从而解除了人类的汉。;针对当代普遍反对神圣不可逾越的经典公理,本论文主张无情的爱国主义表达对于基督救赎的生活和工作的整体救赎是必不可少的。救赎的神学语法处于危急关头:为了减轻人类的苦难,假设上帝是一位和pass可亲的上帝,不仅会破坏对上帝的真正理解,而且还会扭曲化身的神秘性和完整性。在许多爱国神学家中,以淡淡的情感代表对上帝完美情感的消极(消极)认同,亚历山大·西里尔则将其增强为神灵的天赋。西里尔的mia(一门科目)基督教学论证了化身话语者中罪人的改造性救赎,其“不可逾越的苦难”不仅消除了堕落的影响,而且使人类恢复了上帝永恒的交流的初衷。与简单的现代人对淡漠症的误解相反,神的无能加深了我们对神无条件的爱及其转化能力的理解,并寄予了更大的希望,神的医治将促使我们参与他的神性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kim, Paul Inhwan.;

  • 作者单位

    Baylor University.;

  • 授予单位 Baylor University.;
  • 学科 Religion Philosophy of.;Theology.;Asian Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 281 p.
  • 总页数 281
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号