Optimizing the common case has been an adage in decades of processor design practices. However, as the system complexity and optimization techniques' sophistication have increased substantially, maintaining correctness under all situations, however unlikely, is contributing to the necessity of extra conservatism in all layers of the system design. The mounting process, voltage, and temperature variation concerns further add to the conservatism in setting operating parameters. Excessive conservatism in turn hurts performance and efficiency in the common case. However, much of the system's complexity comes from advanced performance features and may not compromise the whole system's functionality and correctness even if some components are imperfect and introduce occasional errors. In this thesis, we propose to separate performance goals from the correctness goal using an explicitly-decoupled architecture.;As a proof-of-concept, we discuss two such incarnations for an out-of-order microprocessor. First, we discuss how explicitly-decoupled architecture can be used to implement an efficient mechanism to track and enforce memory dependences. Later, we discuss enhancements to improve traditional ILP (instruction-level parallelism). In both the designs a decoupled performance enhancement engine performs optimistic execution and helps an independent correctness engine by passing high-quality predictions. The lack of concern for correctness in the performance domain allows us to optimize its execution in a more effective fashion than possible in optimizing a monolithic design with correctness requirements. In this thesis we show that such a decoupled design allows significant optimization benefits and is much less sensitive to conservatism applied in the correctness domain.
展开▼
