首页> 外文学位 >'May I disturb you?': British women writers, imperial identities, and the late Imperial Period, 1880--1940.
【24h】

'May I disturb you?': British women writers, imperial identities, and the late Imperial Period, 1880--1940.

机译:“我能打扰您吗?”:英国女作家,帝王身份和1880--1940年帝国晚期。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

During the late Imperial Period, 1880–1940, the ways in which the identity category “British” was understood created the possibility for fluidity in both personal and collective identity construction. Because the period saw both the greatest expansion of the Empire and the federation of many discrete colonies into national entities, the issue of national versus British affiliation became an important one. Given the particular historical circumstances, budding national identities could be elided into Britishness and Britishness into the budding national identities. And this potential for fluidity influenced the ways people could and did use their British, English, or other colonial identities when negotiation the enormous social, political, economic, and cultural changes of the era. Using Julia Kristeva's notion of the “subject-in-process” and her theory of female individuation, the study examines the writing of four British women writers of the period and its relationship to modern Britishness: “Lucas Malet” from England, “Somerville and Ross” from Ireland, and Rosa Praed from Australia. Though they were all white, middle-class, British women writers, and though they all addressed the complexities and possibilities created by the inter-connected, trans-nationalist slippages of the imperial system, their responses are inflected by the particular relationship of their home place to the culture of the “center.” Lucas Malet understood that, in order to unseat what she considered the “dullness” of the English middle class, she needed to question the legitimacy of the narratives being used to knit women into the English social fabric. For Somerville and Ross, the difficulties women faced in their quests for individuality were compounded by competing narratives of Irish national identity, narratives which often seemed to overpower the thoughtful, intelligent voice of the Anglo-Irish woman. The trauma Rosa Praed experienced in her youth on the Australian frontier is reflected throughout her work in her preoccupation with experiences that are difficult to articulate, can be enormously inspiring, and yet can also be a threat to her heroines' physical and spiritual integrity.
机译:在1880年至1940年帝国末期,人们对身份类别“英国”的理解方式为个人和集体身份建构中的流动性创造了可能性。由于这一时期看到了帝国的最大扩张,也见证了许多离散殖民地联合成国家实体,因此,国民与英国的隶属关系成为一个重要问题。考虑到特定的历史情况,可以将萌芽的民族身份省略为英国身份,而将英国身份忽略为萌芽的民族身份。这种流动性的潜力影响了人们在谈判该时代的巨大社会,政治,经济和文化变革时可以并确实使用其英国,英语或其他殖民地身份的方式。该研究利用茱莉亚·克里斯蒂娃(Julia Kristeva)的“过程中主体”概念和她的女性个性化理论,考察了该时期四位英国女作家的作品及其与现代英国主义的关系:英格兰的“卢卡斯·马莱特”,“索默维尔和来自爱尔兰的Ross”和来自澳大利亚的Rosa Praed。尽管他们都是白人,中产阶级的英国女作家,尽管他们都论述了帝国主义体系相互联系,跨国主义的滑移所带来的复杂性和可能性,但她们的回应受到家园特殊关系的影响。 “中心”文化的地方。卢卡斯·马列特(Lucas Malet)理解,为了摆脱她认为的英国中产阶级的“沉闷”,她需要质疑用来将妇女编织到英国社会结构中的叙述的合法性。对于萨默维尔(Somerville)和罗斯(Ross)而言,女性在追求个性方面面临的困难是由相互竞争的爱尔兰民族身份叙事所加重的,这些叙事常常似乎压倒了英裔爱尔兰妇女的深思熟虑,明智的声音。罗莎·普拉德(Rosa Praed)在青年时期在澳大利亚边境所经历的创伤反映在她的工作中,她沉迷于难以表达的经历,可能极大地鼓舞人心的经历,但也可能威胁到女主人公的身心健康。

著录项

  • 作者

    Priebe, Anna Catherine.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Cincinnati.;

  • 授予单位 University of Cincinnati.;
  • 学科 Literature English.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 206 p.
  • 总页数 206
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号