首页> 外文学位 >A Midsummer Night's Dream: A pedagogical perspective.
【24h】

A Midsummer Night's Dream: A pedagogical perspective.

机译:仲夏夜之梦:教学观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For my Master's thesis I elected to weave in and out of a scholarly and pedagogical dissection of Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream. As a Masters student in the English department I felt that my thesis would be my one last piece of scholarly writing before I pursue my career of teaching English literature at the high school level. I was also aware of the fact that if I were to write an exclusively scholarly thesis on the physiology of looking, the connection between drugs, dreams, and theatre- three different yet similar vulnerable and unguarded states- the anti-theatrical and anti-herbal uprisings of early modern England juxtaposed to those of classical Athens, and other topics of personal interest in A Midsummer Night's Dream, it would be of little benefit to me when staring at a class full of sixteen-year olds. On the flip side, to write an exclusively pedagogical approach would be a disservice to me, considering my passion for renaissance literature, and to my students.;In the article "What is Literacy?" (One of the founding documents of "New Literacy Studies"), Professor James Paul Gee defines literacy and various approaches to maximize the potential of a classroom. The article begins by defining some key concepts which repeatedly make their way into my lesson plans.;Gee begins by defining "acquisition" and "learning". Acquisition is a method of attaining knowledge through natural occurrences/environments. The information is processed directly to the subconscious. Learning is a way of taking in information through a structured series of steps and filtering it consciously. Gee encourages educators to teach students through a combination of acquisition and learning. By doing this we make the students comfortable in an area of study (regardless of subject) in which a comfort did not exist.;The way to naturalize the unnatural is to combine the student's primary discourse (home environment) with their secondary discourse (school). To present the literature exclusively according to definitions and plotline would be exclusively learning (strictly secondary discourse). In order to get the most out of my class, and the most out of the literature, I would have to weave their primary discourse with their secondary discourse. The goal is to bridge the gap between the two environments. This is a tough task considering how different the world is today than it was four hundred years ago in renaissance England...or is it?;There are a plethora of current adolescent issues students can relate to that arise in many of Shakespeare's plays, particularly A Midsummer Night's Dream. The issues of young love, arranged marriages, and erotic release can assist in the environment way of orienting the class to a fuller range of issues rather than just vocabulary. For example, the very first exercise in my lesson plans is a mapping exercise. In this exercise we have the students draw a map with places that they feel freedoms as opposed to places they feel repressed. This brings up the bigger picture of Natural vs. Civil Laws, both in Shakespeare's time as well as today. It raises questions such as: What can you learn in the conventional that you cannot in the unconventional? Where do we find the delicate balance where we have enough rules so that people are not repressed but still maintain civil order? Should sympathy override the law? This simple exercise raises questions which in turn incorporate the student's personal lives to the differences between the extreme law of Athens and the extreme license of the woods.;In order to understand and relate to the issues in the play the class must first get comfortable with the language. That is the main issue high school students have with Shakespeare. "What does that mean?" followed by "Well why doesn't he just say that?" are arguably the most frequently asked questions a high school English teacher will have to face when teaching Shakespeare. Analyzing literature brings me great joy, but we were all in that seat at one point in our lives. Those long nights, sitting over our Folger paperback editions, pulling the hairs out of our heads in frustration, completely baffled at the fact that what we are looking is considered English. In order to get comfortable with the matrix of Shakespearean English and make people realize it arises from a system of language and values I will have them partake in exercises. These exercises include lessons on the rhythm of Shakespeare's language juxtaposed to that of modern day hip-hop, geography-spacial and social conventions, values, and so on. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
机译:对于我的硕士论文,我选择编织莎士比亚的《仲夏夜之梦》的学术和教学法。作为英语系的硕士生,我觉得我的论文将是我在高中阶段从事英语文学教学之前的最后一篇学术论文。我还意识到这样一个事实,即如果我要撰写关于外观生理学,毒品,梦境和戏剧之间的联系的专门学术论文,那么这三种不同但又相似的脆弱和不受保护的国家即反戏剧和反草药现代英格兰早期的起义与古典雅典的起义并列,以及《仲夏夜之梦》中其他个人感兴趣的话题,当我盯着一个满16岁的班级时,对我没有多大好处。另一方面,考虑到我对文艺复兴时期文学的热情以及对我的学生的看法,写一种专门的教学方法对我来说是无益的;在“什么是扫盲?”一文中。 (“新素养研究”的开创性文件之一),詹姆斯·保罗·吉教授(James Paul Gee)定义了读写能力和各种方法,以最大限度地发挥教室的潜力。本文首先定义了一些关键概念,这些概念反复出现在我的课程计划中。Gee首先定义了“获取”和“学习”。习得是一种通过自然发生/环境获取知识的方法。信息直接处理给潜意识。学习是一种通过一系列结构化步骤吸收信息并有意识地对其进行过滤的方法。吉教育鼓励教育工作者通过习得与学习相结合的方式来教导学生。通过这样做,我们使学生在没有舒适感的学习领域(无论学科如何)感到舒适。使非自然自然化的方法是将学生的主要话语(家庭环境)与他们的次要话语(学校)结合起来)。仅根据定义和情节介绍文学作品将是专门的学习(严格来说是次要话语)。为了从课堂上获得最大的收获,从文献中获得最大的收获,我必须将他们的主要话语与次要话语结合起来。目标是弥合两个环境之间的差距。考虑到当今世界与四百年前英格兰文艺复兴有何不同,这是一项艰巨的任务……还是??在莎士比亚的许多戏剧中,学生可能会遇到许多与之相关的当前青少年问题,特别是仲夏夜之梦。年青的爱情,包办婚姻和性爱释放等问题可以帮助环境在课堂上指导更多的问题,而不仅仅是词汇。例如,我的教案中的第一个练习是映射练习。在本练习中,我们让学生绘制一张他们感到自由而不是被压抑的地方的地图。无论是在莎士比亚时代还是今天,这都展现了自然法与民法的更大局面。它提出了一些问题,例如:您可以从常规中学到什么,而在非常规中学到的呢?我们在哪里可以找到微妙的平衡,哪里有足够的规则,以使人们不会受到压制,但仍然可以维持社会秩序?同情应该凌驾于法律之上吗?这个简单的练习提出了一些问题,这些问题又反过来将学生的个人生活与雅典的极端法律和森林的极端许可之间的差异融合在一起;为了理解并与戏剧中的问题联系起来,班级必须首先适应语言。那是高中生与莎士比亚的主要问题。 “这意味着什么?”接着是“为什么他不这么说?”可以说,这是高中英语老师在教莎士比亚时必须面对的最常见问题。分析文学给我带来了极大的快乐,但我们在一生中都坐在那一个位置。漫长的夜晚,坐在我们的Folger平装本上,无奈地将头发从我们的脑海中抽了出来,这完全使我们对所看的东西被视为英语这一事实感到困惑。为了使自己适应莎士比亚英语的基础,并使人们意识到它是由语言和价值观体系产生的,我将让他们参与练习。这些练习包括关于莎士比亚语言与现代嘻哈并列的语言节奏,地理-空间和社会惯例,价值观等方面的课程。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)

著录项

  • 作者

    Eleftheriades, George.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Buffalo.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Buffalo.;
  • 学科 Education Language and Literature.;Literature Modern.;Education Pedagogy.;Literature English.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 99 p.
  • 总页数 99
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号