首页> 外文学位 >The relationship between international trade and environmental regulation under special interest politics.
【24h】

The relationship between international trade and environmental regulation under special interest politics.

机译:特殊利益政治下的国际贸易与环境监管之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The relationship between trade and the environment is of immense concern today. Environmentalists fear that without international coordination, governments will sacrifice environmental quality and the welfare of their citizens to become globally competitive.; Economic theory supports these fears. In the presence of a domestic policy distortion, Bhagwati (1971) demonstrates a reduction in welfare when free trade is adopted. In the presence of an international trade policy distortion, Beghin et al. (1997), and Ederington (2001) show that exogenous trade liberalization brings about a reduction in pollution tax. In the presence of incomplete environmental policy (that does not fully account for environmental damages), Brander and Taylor (1997a, b, and 1998), and Chichilinsky (1994) demonstrate a reduction in welfare when free trade is adopted.; Before we conclude that environmentalists' fears are well founded a few questions need to be considered. The results listed above are based on exogenously given environmental or trade policy distortions. The reason why policies are distorted is not explained. Would endogenizing these distortions produce different results? Further, in the studies cited above, no mechanism for the choice of free trade is specified. If the adoption of free trade causes a reduction in aggregate welfare, why would a country with policy distortions ever adopt free trade? Why is free trade relevant in this context?; In this dissertation I provide a comprehensive analysis of the interaction of international trade and pollution policy. Assuming that most policies are outcomes of a political process, policy distortions are attributed to the presence of special interest influence. The political process defined in the dissertation also provides a well defined mechanism for the choice of free trade.; I find that the adoption of free trade under incomplete pollution policy does not necessarily cause a reduction in aggregate welfare. Plausible conditions exist under which an improvement in pollution policy accompanies the choice of free trade. Under the same conditions, a country with incomplete pollution policy can enhance aggregate welfare by adopting free trade.
机译:今天,贸易与环境之间的关系备受关注。环保主义者担心,如果没有国际协调,各国政府将牺牲环境质量和公民福利,使其具有全球竞争力。经济理论支持了这些担忧。在存在国内政策扭曲的情况下,巴格瓦蒂(Bhagwati,1971)证明了采用自由贸易时福利的下降。在存在国际贸易政策扭曲的情况下,Beghin等人。 (1997年)和埃德灵顿(2001年)表明,外源贸易自由化带来了污染税的减少。在存在不完整的环境政策(不能完全解决环境损害)的情况下,Brander和Taylor(1997a,b和1998)和Chichilinsky(1994)证明,采用自由贸易时福利会降低。在我们断定环保主义者的担忧是有根据的之前,需要考虑一些问题。上面列出的结果是基于外部给定的环境或贸易政策失真。没有说明政策扭曲的原因。内生化这些失真会产生不同的结果吗?此外,在以上引用的研究中,没有指定自由贸易的选择机制。如果采用自由贸易会导致总福利的减少,为什么一个政策扭曲的国家会采用自由贸易?为什么在这种情况下自由贸易有意义?在本文中,我对国际贸易与污染政策之间的相互作用进行了全面的分析。假设大多数政策是政治进程的结果,那么政策扭曲就是由于特殊利益的影响。论文所定义的政治过程也为自由贸易的选择提供了完善的机制。我发现,在不完全的污染政策下采用自由贸易并不一定会导致总福利的下降。存在合理的条件,在这种条件下,污染政策的改善伴随着自由贸易的选择。在相同条件下,污染政策不完整的国家可以通过实行自由贸易来提高总体福利。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gulati, Sumeet.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Maryland College Park.;

  • 授予单位 University of Maryland College Park.;
  • 学科 Economics Agricultural.; Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 135 p.
  • 总页数 135
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 农业经济;政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号