首页> 外文学位 >A quantitative study of the Reading First initiative teacher training program in reducing student referrals for special education services.
【24h】

A quantitative study of the Reading First initiative teacher training program in reducing student referrals for special education services.

机译:“阅读优先”倡议教师培训计划的定量研究,目的是减少特殊教育服务的推荐学生人数。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The problem investigated in this research study relates to the referral rate for special education evaluations between students of teachers who were exposed to the professional development and resources associated with the federally funded Reading First program and students of teachers who were not exposed to the program. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a statistically significant difference in student referral rates for special education evaluations existed at the selected schools. The sample selected for the study was drawn from two elementary schools located in a single Massachusetts school district. Participating students will have completed Grade 1 through Grade 3 at one of the two school sites by June 2008. Students from one school comprised the treatment group and students in the other school comprised the comparison group. Although the comparison school did not have access to the Reading First resources, both schools used common reading assessments instruments. The research design selected for this study was an ex post facto causal--comparative, retrospective design analyzing longitudinal data for the 2006-08 school years. The data were processed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) statistical technique to test for differences in single-dependent variables across the two student groups and a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) to simultaneously test for differences in multiple dependent variables across the two student groups. To assist with addressing the nonrandom selection of the two selected populations, an analysis of student Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment Scores (MCAS), gender, and free and reduced-price lunch were analyzed using a chi-square test for significance. Several factors were identified highlighting potential causes for the difference between the groups. The factors that were identified were gender, ethnicity, free or reduced-price lunch program, and the Reading First training program.;Combinations of these factors were also explored to be a possible factor for such difference. From the statistical results, with the exception of gender, it can be concluded that all factors, including their combinations, are significant factors that can affect the assessment scores of student from different grade levels.
机译:在本研究中调查的问题与特殊职业评估的推荐率有关,这种特殊推荐是指接受过专业发展培训的学生与与联邦政府资助的Reading First计划相关的资源与未接受该计划的老师之间的资源。这项研究的目的是调查在选定的学校中,特殊教育评估的学生推荐率是否存在统计学上的显着差异。选择用于研究的样本来自位于马萨诸塞州一个学区的两所小学。参加的学生将在2008年6月之前在两所学校之一完成1年级至3年级的学习。治疗组来自一所学校的学生,而比较组则来自另一所学校的学生。尽管比较学校无法使用“阅读优先”资源,但两家学校都使用通用的阅读评估工具。为本研究选择的研究设计是事后因果,对比,回顾性设计,分析了2006-08学年的纵向数据。使用方差分析(ANOVA)统计技术处理数据以测试两个学生组中单因变量的差异,并使用多元方差分析(MANOVA)来同时测试两个学生中多个因变量的差异。组。为了帮助解决两个选定人群的非随机选择问题,使用卡方检验分析了学生马萨诸塞州综合评估评分(MCAS),性别以及免费和减价午餐的分析。确定了几个因素,突显了两组之间差异的潜在原因。确定的因素包括性别,种族,免费或减价午餐计划以及“阅读优先”培训计划。;还探讨了这些因素的组合,可能是造成这种差异的因素。从统计结果来看,除性别外,可以得出结论,所有因素,包括其组合,都是可以影响不同年级学生评估成绩的重要因素。

著录项

  • 作者

    Maestas, Gary E.;

  • 作者单位

    Regent University.;

  • 授予单位 Regent University.;
  • 学科 Education Tests and Measurements.;Education Reading.;Education Special.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 176 p.
  • 总页数 176
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号