首页> 外文学位 >Icons of rulership: Imperial portraiture during the Ming dynasty (1368--1644).
【24h】

Icons of rulership: Imperial portraiture during the Ming dynasty (1368--1644).

机译:统治的标志:明朝(1368--1644)的皇家肖像画。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

At the beginning of the Ming dynasty (1368--1644), life portraits of emperors and empresses followed conventions established centuries earlier during the Song and Yuan dynasties, and sovereigns were depicted in naturalistic, three-quarter poses. Continuing in this tradition, the first Ming emperor, Hongwu (r. 1368--98), was portrayed in a pose that emphasized three-dimensionality. In the fifteenth century, however, Hongzhi (r. 1488--1505), the ninth Ming emperor, was depicted frontally and symmetrically, centered within a monumental composition and seated on a richly decorated chair framed by a screen of painted dragons. He stares directly outward, nearly expressionless, with his body dissolved beneath robes decorated with cosmological symbols of rulership.;This dissertation will examine the transformation of the imperial image from Hongwu to Hongzhi, arguing that the portrait of Hongzhi can be read as an icon of rulership. Through an analysis of the artistic concerns of imperial portraiture as well as the politico-religious context, I will trace the emergence of the iconic portrait of Hongzhi and attribute it to several factors: a new conception of the public function of imperial portraits, which ceased to be considered simply as objects of private veneration; the visual stimuli of Tibetan Buddhist icons, brought to the court in response to the early Ming emperors' interest in Tibetan Buddhism; and the invention of a dragon robe that symbolized legitimate rulership.;The combination of these three factors over nearly a century contributed to the creation of the new Ming imperial icon. After the establishment of the imperial icon, both imperial portraits from the late Ming and non-imperial ancestor portraits followed this new paradigm. In certain figure paintings, artists even eschewed naturalism to depict the emperor in an iconic pose whereas all the other figures were rendered more realistically. Imperial portraits from the Qing dynasty (1644--1911) similarly used this basic formula, incorporating new elements to suit the tastes of the Manchu emperors. The new Ming imperial portrait icon thus had long lasting effects in Chinese portraiture.
机译:在明朝(1368--1644)初期,皇帝和皇后的生活肖像遵循的是宋元时期早几个世纪以来确立的惯例,而君主则以自然主义的四分之三姿势来描绘。秉承这一传统,刻画了明朝的第一位皇帝洪武(r。1368--98),其姿势强调三维感。然而,在十五世纪,正面和对称地描绘了明朝的第九个皇帝洪zhi(1488--1505年),居中立于纪念碑中,坐在装饰精美的椅子上,椅子由画龙的屏风框住。他直接朝外凝视,几乎没有表情,他的身体被装饰在装饰着统治学的宇宙学符号的长袍下;本论文将研究从洪武到洪治的皇帝形象的转变,认为洪治的画像可以被解读为统治。通过对皇家肖像画的艺术关注以及政治宗教背景的分析,我将追溯到洪志的肖像画的出现,并将其归因于以下几个因素:对皇家肖像画的公共功能的新观念,这种观念已经停止。仅被视为私人崇拜的对象;视明朝皇帝对藏传佛教的兴趣,将藏传佛教圣像的视觉刺激带入法庭;以及象征着合法统治的龙袍的发明。这三个因素在近一个世纪的结合中共同创造了新的明朝圣像。在建立皇室圣像之后,明末的皇室画像和非皇室的祖先画像都遵循了这一新范式。在某些人物画中,艺术家甚至避开了自然主义,以标志性的姿态描绘了皇帝,而所有其他人物则更为真实。清朝(1644--1911)的皇室画像同样使用了这一基本公式,并结合了新的元素以适应满族皇帝的口味。因此,新的明代皇朝画像在中国画像中具有长期的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ching, Dora C. Y.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton University.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton University.;
  • 学科 History Asia Australia and Oceania.;Art History.;Asian Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 290 p.
  • 总页数 290
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号