首页> 外文学位 >Soviet Roots of Post-Soviet Order.
【24h】

Soviet Roots of Post-Soviet Order.

机译:后苏联秩序的苏联根源。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation draws attention to the Soviet roots of the post-Soviet social order. It argues that seven decades of Soviet state-led development and population management reshaped social orders in a manner that limited the potential for social cooperation after the collapse of the communist regime. A number of pathologies plaguing post-communist Russia, from the astoundingly high levels of violent crime to political disengagement, may be conceptualized as breakdowns of social cooperation. High levels of violent crime indicate not only a deficient state capacity for crime control, but also a weak social capacity for cooperation in the task of informal control; similarly, levels of electoral participation correspond to citizens' willingness to cooperate in the task of democratic self-governance. The weakness of social cooperation in its various forms in post-communist Russia, I argue, is rooted in its communist past --- in particular, in the extent to which local social orders were overturned and reshaped by coercive state-led modernization. Using a variety of historical sources, I document the legacy bestowed by coercive and artificial development and population management strategies, showing that its burdens are distributed unequally across Russia. I demonstrate that the burden of the Soviet legacy may be approximated quantitatively with historic population data; so understood, the legacy burden helps greatly to account for the striking variation in homicide mortality across Russia's sub-national regions. Aspects of the same legacy also help explain the cross-regional variation in voter turnout in early post-communist elections. In sum, the distinct geography of command and coercion in the Soviet period is reproduced after the Soviet collapse as a geography of weak cooperation, whether for the purposes of containing interpersonal violence or participating in determining the country's political future.
机译:本文引起人们对后苏联社会秩序的苏联根源的关注。它认为,由苏联领导的七十年发展和人口管理以某种方式重塑了社会秩序,从而限制了共产主义政权崩溃后社会合作的潜力。令人震惊的后共产主义俄罗斯的各种病态,从令人震惊的高水平的暴力犯罪到政治上的脱离接触,都可以被概念化为社会合作的崩溃。暴力犯罪的高发不仅表明国家控制犯罪的能力不足,而且在非正式控制任务中的合作社会能力也很弱;同样,选举参与的水平与公民在民主自治中的合作意愿相对应。我认为,在后共产主义的俄罗斯,各种形式的社会合作的弱点根源于共产主义的过去,特别是在以国家为主导的现代化强制性推翻和改造地方社会秩序的程度上。通过各种历史资料,我记录了强制性和人为发展以及人口管理战略赋予的遗产,表明其负担在俄罗斯各地分布不均。我证明,可以根据历史人口数据定量估算苏联遗产的负担。因此,遗留负担极大地有助于解释整个俄罗斯次地区凶杀死亡率的惊人变化。相同遗产的各个方面也有助于解释早期后共产主义选举中选民投票率的跨地区差异。总而言之,苏联解体后的独特指挥和胁迫地理,是为了遏制人际暴力或参与决定该国的政治未来而合作薄弱的地理。

著录项

  • 作者

    Treyger, Elina Alexandra.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.;Law.;East European Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 356 p.
  • 总页数 356
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号