首页> 外文学位 >The meaning and essence of fairness in the workplace: A phenomenological study of organizational justice.
【24h】

The meaning and essence of fairness in the workplace: A phenomenological study of organizational justice.

机译:工作场所公平的含义和本质:对组织正义的现象学研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The large volume of research published on organizational justice is a testament to its importance, but the sparseness of qualitative studies has been at odds with its phenomenological nature. After all, organizational justice is the study of people's perceptions of fairness in the workplace. Yet definitions of the constructs of organizational justice appear to favor the interests and outcomes of the organization over the direct experiences lived by and the abstract conceptualizations made by the worker. There has been an outward focus for organizational justice. Less apparent has been an inward focus on understanding and responding to the perceptions about workplace fairness formed by the individual. The accepted constructs of organizational justice have supported analysis of outcomes, exchanges, and activities created and controlled to advance the interests of the organization and have not considered the everyday work life of the worker.;This qualitative study of fairness in the workplace in the tradition of transcendental phenomenology used a purposeful sample of eight correctional officers. The analysis yielded a composite statement of the meaning and essence of the workers' experience of fairness and unfairness in the workplace. This study revealed five properties of workplace fairness expressed by the workers: place, contribution, situation, relationships with others, and relationship with one's own work. Unique qualities were defined for each property and accompanied by descriptors of valence indicating the workers' polarity towards fairness and unfairness.;A second finding was that the temporality of workplace fairness extends in time beyond organization boundaries. Third, there are direct experiences and conceptualizations that involve workers of which the organization may be unaware. The fourth and final finding is that the organization may desire to lead workers to form perceptions of organizational justice, but workers form perceptions about workplace fairness on their own.
机译:关于组织公正的大量研究证明了它的重要性,但是定性研究的稀疏性与现象学的性质相矛盾。毕竟,组织公正是人们对工作场所公平感的研究。然而,相对于工人所经历的直接经验和工人所作出的抽象概念化,组织正义构架的定义似乎更有利于组织的利益和成果。组织公正一直受到外部关注。不太明显的是对个人形成的关于工作场所公平感的理解和回应。公认的组织正义构架支持对为促进组织利益而建立和控制的成果,交流和活动的分析,而没有考虑工人的日常工作生活。;这种传统上对工作场所公平性的定性研究先验现象学的研究使用了八名惩教人员的有目的样本。分析得出了工人在工作场所公平和不公平经验的意义和实质的综合陈述。这项研究揭示了工人表达的工作场所公平的五个属性:位置,贡献,处境,与他人的关系以及与自己工作的关系。每个属性都定义了独特的品质,并伴随着价格的描述,表明工人对公平和不公平的极性。第二个发现是,工作场所公平性的时间性超越了组织界限。第三,有些直接的经验和概念化涉及组织可能不了解的工人。第四个也是最后一个发现是,组织可能希望引导工人形成对组织正义的看法,但工人自己形成对工作场所公平性的看法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Smith, R. Stephen.;

  • 作者单位

    The George Washington University.;

  • 授予单位 The George Washington University.;
  • 学科 Psychology Industrial.;Sociology Organization Theory.;Sociology Organizational.;Sociology Industrial and Labor Relations.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 310 p.
  • 总页数 310
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号