首页> 外文学位 >The dilemma of charismatic authority: Mao's cultural revolution in China.
【24h】

The dilemma of charismatic authority: Mao's cultural revolution in China.

机译:魅力权威的困境:毛泽东在中国的文化革命。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation explains why Mao mobilized a mass rebellion against his own party-state, why and how he was trapped in a dilemma between mass factional war and conservative military rule during the movement, and why he concluded his anti-bureaucratic movement by using the military bureaucracy to repress the mass rebels. Developing Weber's theory of charismatic authority and its routinization tendency, this dissertation argues that the contrasting dimensions and elements of charismatic and bureaucratic authorities generate a simultaneously interdependent and conflicting relationship when these two authorities coexist in a single regime. The Maoist post-revolutionary regime was such a regime, based on a combination of Mao's charismatic authority and the party-state's bureaucratic authority. Mao's intention to maintain his personal charismatic authority conflicted with the bureaucratization tendency of his party-state. From the perspective of this dissertation, Mao's Cultural Revolution was a charismatic attempt to overcome this bureaucratization tendency. However, the movement contained an innate contradiction in that it fought bureaucratization while defending its structural base, the centralized party-state system at the same time. This contradiction, I argue, was rooted in the double identity of Mao as the charismatic leader of a post-revolutionary regime: on the one hand, Mao was the founder and the guardian angel of his party-state; on the other hand, he had to combat its bureaucratization tendency in order to maintain his personal charismatic authority. Mao's concern about the maintenance of his party-state set the limit to the anti-institutional logic of his charismatic authority. This mix of anti-institutional radicalism and institutional conservatism provided space for their appropriation by the mass and bureaucratic forces to pursue their own agendas in implementing Mao's movement. These appropriations generated the radical dynamics of mass factionalism and the conservative mechanism of bureaucratic institutionalization. They interacted with Mao's intervention to generate the cyclical dynamics of the Cultural Revolution and trapped Mao in a real dilemma. Facing the intractable mass factionalism that tended to pull his regime apart, Mao had to repress it through the military bureaucracy in order to maintain his regime.
机译:这篇论文解释了为什么毛泽东发动大规模叛乱来反对自己的政党国家,为什么以及如何在运动期间陷入大规模派系战争和保守军事统治之间的困境,以及为什么他通过使用军事来结束他的反官僚运动。官僚镇压群众叛乱。本文发展了韦伯的魅力权威理论及其日常化趋势,认为当两个权威共存于一个政权中时,魅力权威与官僚权威的对比维度和要素会同时产生相互依存和冲突的关系。毛泽东革命后政权就是这样一种政权,建立在毛泽东的超凡魅力权威与党国官僚主义权威相结合的基础上。毛泽东维持个人魅力的意图与党国的官僚主义倾向相矛盾。从本文的角度来看,毛泽东的文化大革命是一种克服这种官僚主义倾向的超凡魅力的尝试。但是,该运动有一个先天的矛盾之处,就是它在捍卫官僚主义的同时捍卫了其结构基础,即中央集权的政党国家体系。我认为,这种矛盾源于毛泽东是革命后政权的有魅力的领导者的双重身份:一方面,毛泽东是其党国的创始人和守护天使;另一方面,毛泽东是他的党国的创始人和守护天使。另一方面,为了维持个人魅力,他不得不与官僚主义作斗争。毛泽东对维护党国的担忧为他的魅力权威的反制度逻辑设定了界限。反制度激进主义和制度保守主义的混合,为群众和官僚力量拨出了自己的空间,以推行自己的执行毛泽东运动的议程。这些拨款产生了大规模的派系主义和官僚制度化的保守机制。他们与毛泽东的干预互动,产生了文化大革命的周期性动力,使毛泽东陷入了真正的困境。面对难以将自己的政权瓦解的顽固的群众派系主义,毛泽东不得不通过军事官僚机构压制它,以维持自己的政权。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wu, Lili.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Chicago.;
  • 学科 History Asia Australia and Oceania.;Sociology Social Structure and Development.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 285 p.
  • 总页数 285
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号