首页> 外文学位 >College women or college girls? Gender, sexuality, and in loco parentis on campus.
【24h】

College women or college girls? Gender, sexuality, and in loco parentis on campus.

机译:女大学生还是女大学生?性别,性行为以及校园内的父母亲。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Undergraduate women's struggles to terminate the university's role in loco parentis represented a revolutionary moment on American campuses in the 1960s. Though the end results were strikingly similar across regions and schools, the paths to change were very different on historically black college campuses when compared to predominantly white college campuses. Challenges to in loco parentis regulations took place earlier on coeducational campuses than at women's colleges. At each college or university, students forged a common language of rights to rescind long-standing non-academic regulations.;Student protests against in loco parentis policies emerged out of widespread civil rights activism and Black Power ideology by mid-decade at Howard University in Washington, D.C. and at Spelman College in Atlanta, Georgia. Undergraduate women framed arguments against in loco parentis rules in terms of civil rights and student respectability successfully to dismantle non-academic regulations on campus by the late sixties. On predominantly white campuses, the tradition of student self-government influenced the shape and tone of women's anti-in loco parentis protests. The movement to end the role of the university in place of the parent harbingered the women's rights movement of the late 1960s at the Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio and at Simmons College in Boston, Massachusetts. Women's protests on each campus mobilized female students and significantly impacted their understanding of gender issues within the broader American culture.;The underlying concern of administrators and parents regarding morality and sexuality on campus permeated campus debates. The in loco parentis ideology ultimately proved obsolete as campus officials realized that they could not codify or enforce individual morality in the face of strident student demands for privacy and self determination. Undergraduate women struggled to redefine femininity and women's roles in light of shifts in the gender and race structures of American life. During the 1970s undergraduate women pressured campus administrations to institute programs and services the students themselves deemed necessary to their success and welfare on campus. College women learned to navigate campus life without the special protections and pre-established women's community that in loco parentis policies and women's self-government had once provided.
机译:女大学生为终止大学在父母中的角色而进行的斗争代表了1960年代美国校园的革命性时刻。尽管最终结果在各个地区和学校之间都惊人地相似,但是与主要是白人大学校园相比,历史上黑人大学校园的变革之路却截然不同。在男女同校制校园中,对父母亲机车法规的挑战要早于女子学院。在每所学院或大学中,学生为废除长期的非学术性法规建立了共同的权利语言;学生对父母亲政策的抗议源于十年前中期在霍华德大学广泛的民权活动主义和黑人权力意识形态。华盛顿特区和佐治亚州亚特兰大的斯佩尔曼学院。在民权和学生尊敬方面,大学生妇女反对父母亲父母规则中的反对,成功地在六十年代末消除了校园的非学术性规定。在以白人为主的校园中,学生自治的传统影响了女性反亲父母抗议活动的形式和语气。结束大学角色代替父母的运动预示着1960年代后期在俄亥俄州哥伦布的俄亥俄州立大学和马萨诸塞州波士顿的西蒙斯学院的妇女权利运动。每个校园的妇女抗议活动动员了女学生,并极大地影响了她们对更广泛的美国文化内的性别问题的理解。管理人员和家长对校园道德和性行为的根本关注贯穿了校园辩论。由于校园官员意识到面对学生对隐私和自我决定的强烈要求,他们无法编纂或加强个人道德,因此最终的父母亲内部意识形态已被淘汰。鉴于美国生活中的性别和种族结构发生了变化,本科女性努力重新定义女性气质和女性角色。在1970年代,女大学生向校园管理部门施加压力,要求他们制定课程和服务,以使学生自己认为对他们的成功和福利至关重要。大学妇女学会了在没有特殊保护的情况下驾驭校园生活,并建立了以前在地方父母政策和妇女自治中曾经提供过的妇女社区。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lansley, Renee N.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 History Black.;Womens Studies.;Education Higher.;History United States.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 418 p.
  • 总页数 418
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:44:30

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号