首页> 外文学位 >Implications of classroom writing instruction emphasizing imagination, creativity, and dialogue: A case study.
【24h】

Implications of classroom writing instruction emphasizing imagination, creativity, and dialogue: A case study.

机译:强调想象力,创造力和对话能力的课堂写作教学的启示:一个案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

When we consider the role of writing in our language arts classrooms today, I would argue that the vast majority of it is framed by Freire's (1984) banking model of education, wherein we have a teacher who knows how to pass a standardized writing test and tries to deposit that information into the learner who knows nothing. In fact, to extend the metaphor, the only withdrawal that seems important to either the teacher or the student is what product the student creates at the time of the test.;Somehow, we language arts teachers have found ourselves in the unfavorable position of having betrayed our own knowledge and expertise. Essentially, the problem that this study seeks to address is the surrendering of effective, creative, and imaginative writing strategies to the narrow scope of writing as evidence of understanding and standardized test preparation.;The purpose of this study was to inform three primary questions: (1) What are students' perceptions of the use of the arts as a tool for writing and making meaning? (2) How would a deliberate, honest, and authentic approach to increasing and facilitating dialogue and communication in the language arts classroom affect students' writing and/or their writing process? (3) What effect does using empathic literature selections have on students' writing?;The study was a naturalistic case study that led to several findings. Of the arts, the study revealed that students demonstrated increased confidence in their writing and began to value the process of writing over the product. Further, students perceived this writing approach as new and freeing. Of dialogue, the study revealed that dialogue is a dynamic convention, one that constantly changes and rarely looks the same in different contexts, and that an honest, deliberate, authentic approach to increasing dialogue creates a comfort and familiarity that encourages writing as well as sharing. Finally, the use of empathic texts allowed students to demonstrate greater clarity and organization in their writing. Students also developed a new approach to voice and audience, and empathic texts fostered empathy within students' writing.
机译:当我们考虑写作在当今语言艺术教室中的作用时,我会认为其中的绝大多数是由Freire(1984)的教育银行模式所构架的,其中我们有一位知道如何通过标准化写作测试的老师,并且尝试将这些信息存放到一无所知的学习者手中。实际上,为了扩大隐喻,对老师或学生而言似乎唯一重要的退学是学生在测试时所创造的产品。以某种方式,我们语言艺术老师发现自己处于不利地位出卖了我们自己的知识和专长。从本质上讲,本研究要解决的问题是将有效,创新和富于想象力的写作策略放弃在狭窄的写作范围内,以作为理解和标准化考试准备的证据。本研究的目的是为三个主要问题提供信息: (1)学生对使用艺术作为写作和表达意义的工具有什么看法? (2)在语言艺术教室中有意,诚实和真实的方法来增加和促进对话与交流会如何影响学生的写作和/或他们的写作过程? (3)善解人意的文献选择对学生的写作有什么影响?该研究是一个自然主义的案例研究,得出了一些发现。在艺术方面,研究表明,学生对写作表现出越来越大的信心,并开始重视产品写作过程。此外,学生们认为这种写作方法是新颖而自由的。关于对话,研究表明对话是一种动态的惯例,这种惯例会不断变化,在不同的环境中很少出现相同的现象,诚实,刻意,真实的增加对话的方式会产生一种舒适感和亲密感,鼓励写作和分享。最后,使用共情的文本可以使学生在写作中表现出更高的清晰度和组织性。学生们还开发了一种表达声音和听众的新方法,而同理心的文本则促进了学生写作中的同理心。

著录项

  • 作者

    Howell, Steven J.;

  • 作者单位

    Kent State University.;

  • 授予单位 Kent State University.;
  • 学科 Education Language and Literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 250 p.
  • 总页数 250
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号