首页> 外文学位 >Cognitive engagement in online discourse: A phenomenological study of knowledge construction in asynchronous dialogic communities of practice.
【24h】

Cognitive engagement in online discourse: A phenomenological study of knowledge construction in asynchronous dialogic communities of practice.

机译:在线话语中的认知参与:异步对话社区实践中知识建构的现象学研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As online learning continues to gain popularity and acceptance in higher education, researchers are turning their attention to the search for evidence of learning, and in doing so, they are finding the transcripts of asynchronous computer conferences to be rich sources of data. The analysis of these data, however, becomes problematic due to the lack of appropriate tools for studying asynchronous discourse.; This is a study of asynchronous online learning in the context of a professional, online master's program for teachers. 4 questions guided this study: What kinds of discourse interactions do learners engage in when participating in asynchronous online dialogue? Which of these discourse interactions, if any, are associated with student knowledge construction? What are the indicators of these interactions? Is it possible to distinguish reliably among kinds of discourse interactions associated with student learning?; To answer these questions, this researcher analyzed four conversation threads generated in the Online Master of Arts in Educational Technology (OMAET) program at Pepperdine University's Graduate School of Education and Psychology.; 2 original rubrics were created to analyze (a) the intended audience and (b) the discourse function of these asynchronous messages. Open-ended interviews were conducted with 8 of the 23 members of the class to better understand the context of the messages. Despite achieving strong interrater reliability, the coders of the newsgroup messages were unable to discern subtle indictors of Discourse Function within the Argumentation/Disagreement category.; From this study, the following conclusions were drawn: (a) The accurate coding of conversation threads requires that messages be considered as connected parts of a larger narrative rather than as discrete units of meaning. (b) The practice of dialogic writing within Asynchronous Communities of Practice helps students to learn by allowing them to clarify their thoughts and test ideas, although tangible evidence of learning may not be present in the written discourse. Asynchronous transcripts cannot capture the more elusive social elements of online learning such as "back rooming." (d) Storytelling figured prominently in the academic threads and more research is needed on the relationship between storytelling and learning in online contexts.
机译:随着在线学习在高等教育中继续获得普及和接受,研究人员将注意力转向寻找学习证据,并且这样做,他们发现异步计算机会议的笔录是丰富的数据源。然而,由于缺乏研究异步话语的适当工具,对这些数据的分析变得有问题。这是针对教师的专业在线硕士学位课程中的异步在线学习的研究。这项研究指导了四个问题:参加异步在线对话时,学习者会进行哪些类型的语篇互动?这些话语互动中的哪一种(如果有)与学生的知识建构有关?这些相互作用的指标是什么?是否可以可靠地区分与学生学习相关的各种语篇互动?为了回答这些问题,该研究人员分析了Pepperdine大学教育与心理学研究生院在线教育技术艺术硕士(OMAET)计划中产生的四个对话主题。创建了2个原始标题,以分析(a)目标受众和(b)这些异步消息的话语功能。对全班23名成员中的8名进行了不限成员名额的采访,以更好地理解这些信息的背景。尽管实现了强大的界面可靠性,但新闻组消息的编码人员仍无法分辨“论证/分歧”类别中话语功能的细微指示。从这项研究中得出以下结论:(a)对话线程的准确编码要求将消息视为较大的叙述的连接部分,而不应视为离散的含义单元。 (b)在异步实践社区中进行对话写作的做法可以使学生澄清自己的思想和检验思想,从而帮助学生学习,尽管书面语篇中可能没有明显的学习证据。异步笔录无法捕获在线学习中比较难以捉摸的社交元素,例如“后退”。 (d)讲故事在学术界占主导地位,在网络环境中讲故事和学习之间的关系还需要进行更多的研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Flynn, Theresa M.;

  • 作者单位

    Pepperdine University.;

  • 授予单位 Pepperdine University.;
  • 学科 Language Linguistics.; Education Technology.; Language Rhetoric and Composition.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 192 p.
  • 总页数 192
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 语言学;语言学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号