首页> 外文学位 >Doing without desiring.
【24h】

Doing without desiring.

机译:不需要做。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation defends a cognitivist alternative to the Humean belief-desire theory of motivation against standard philosophical arguments.;Moral judgments influence our action. For instance, someone might donate to charity because she believes she has a duty to give back to her community. According to the Humean orthodoxy, some additional state - some passion or desire - is needed to explain her action. She may want to donate the money, to give back to her community, or to fulfill her duty. Yet there must be something she wants, the Humean insists, because only desires are capable of moving us. Even moral judgment is no more than desire's slave.;This dissertation explores the possibility that cognitive states are capable of playing a directly motivational role. I argue that the standard philosophical arguments against this possibility do not survive close scrutiny. Instead of proceeding from assumptions about rationality, morality, and agency that frequently drive motivational cognitivists, my arguments are distinctive in that they are built largely out of Humean materials; these arguments show how cognitivism is compatible with many of the considerations Humeans have used to make their account seem compelling.;For instance, agents who are unmoved by their moral judgments are often taken as evidence for the Humean Theory. This is odd, since agents are not uniformly moved by their desires either. Moral beliefs and desires seem as though they may be closely analogous in this respect.;I also try to show that desire-based motivation might serve as a useful model for cognitive motivation by arguing that cognitivists can explain motivated action in ways that parallel desire-based explanations. While these cognitivist explanations are committed to the existence of besires, I argue that this is no problem for the view. Humean a priori proclamations that besires would be incoherent or absurd notwithstanding, the arguments of this dissertation suggest that besires are not so bizarre. Indeed, I argue that their existence would follow from plausible empirical hypotheses.
机译:本文捍卫了认知主义,替代了休曼的信念-欲望动机理论,反对标准的哲学论证。道德判断影响了我们的行动。例如,某人可能会捐赠给慈善机构,因为她认为自己有责任回馈社区。根据休曼正教派的说法,需要一些其他状态-一些激情或欲望-来解释她的行为。她可能想捐钱,回馈社区或履行职责。 Humean坚持说,她必须要有一些东西,因为只有欲望才能使我们感动。甚至道德判断也只不过是欲望的奴隶。本论文探讨了认知状态能够直接发挥激励作用的可能性。我认为,反对这种可能性的标准哲学论点不能幸免于难。我的论点与众不同的是,它们很大程度上是由休曼的材料构成的,而不是从经常驱动动机认知主义者的关于理性,道德和代理的假设出发。这些论据表明,认知主义如何与休曼人用来使自己的陈述令人信服的许多考虑因素兼容。例如,经常被道德判断所打动的代理人通常被视为休曼人理论的证据。这很奇怪,因为代理人也不会因他们的愿望而统一移动。道德信念和欲望似乎在这方面可能是非常相似的。;我还试图证明基于欲望的动机可以作为认知动机的有用模型,他认为认知主义者可以用平行于欲望的方式解释动机行为。基础的解释。尽管这些认知主义的解释是致力于存在野兽,但我认为这对观点没有问题。休ean斯先验性地宣称,尽管拜拜是不一致的或荒谬的,但本文的论点表明,拜拜并不是那么离奇。实际上,我认为它们的存在将遵循合理的经验假设。

著录项

  • 作者

    Swartzer, Steven E.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 201 p.
  • 总页数 201
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号