首页> 外文学位 >Developmental differences in locomotor responsiveness to amphetamine in rats.
【24h】

Developmental differences in locomotor responsiveness to amphetamine in rats.

机译:大鼠对苯丙胺的运动反应发育差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The developmental remodelling of motivational systems that underlie drug dependence and addiction may account for the greater frequency and severity of drug abuse in adolescence compared to adulthood. Recent advances in animal models have begun to identify the morphological and the molecular factors that are being remodelled, but little is known about the culmination of these factors in altered sensitivity to psychostimulant drugs, like amphetamine, in adolescence. Amphetamine induces potent locomotor activating effects in rodents through increased dopamine release in the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system, which makes locomotor activity a useful behavioural marker of age differences in amphetamine sensitivity. The aim of the thesis was to investigate the neural basis for age differences in amphetamine sensitivity with a focus on the nucleus accumbens and the medial prefrontal cortex, which initiate and regulate amphetamine-induced locomotor activity, respectively.;The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is a key regulator of the locomotor activating effects of amphetamine that undergoes extensive remodelling in adolescence. In study 3, I found that an i.p. injection of 1.5, and not of 0.5, mg/kg of amphetamine resulted in a high expression of c-fos, a marker of neural activation, in the prelimbic mPFC only in pre-pubertal adolescent rats. This finding suggests that the ability of adolescent rats to overcome hypoactivity at the 1.5 mg/kg dose may involve greater activation of the prelimbic mPFC compared to adulthood. In support of this hypothesis, I found that pharmacological inhibition of prelimbic D1 dopamine receptors disrupted the locomotor activating effects of the 1.5 mg/kg dose of amphetamine to a greater extent in adolescent than in adult rats. In addition, the stimulation of prelimbic D1 dopamine receptors potentiated locomotor activity at the 0.5 mg/kg dose of amphetamine only in adolescent rats, indicating that the prelimbic D1 dopamine receptors are involved in overcoming locomotor hypoactivity during adolescence.;Given my finding that the locomotor activating effects of amphetamine rely on slightly different mechanisms in adolescence than in adulthood, study 4 was designed to determine whether the lasting consequences of drug use would also differ with age. A short period of pre-treatment with 0.5 mg/kg of amphetamine in adolescence, but not in adulthood, resulted in heightened sensitivity to an injection of amphetamine given 30 days after the start of the procedure, when adolescent rats had reached adulthood. The finding of an age-specific increase in amphetamine sensitivity is consistent with evidence for increased risk for addiction when drug use is initiated in adolescence compared to adulthood in people (Merline et al., 2002), and with the hypothesis that adolescence is a sensitive period of development.;In study 1, I found pre- and post- pubertal adolescent rats to be less active (i.e., hypoactive) than adults to a first injection of 0.5, but not of 1.5, mg/kg of intraperitonealy (i.p.) administered amphetamine. Although initially hypoactive, only adolescent rats exhibited an increase in activity to a second injection of amphetamine given 24 h later, indicating that adolescents may be more sensitive to the rapid changes in amphetamine-induced plasticity than adults. Given that the locomotor activating effects of amphetamine are initiated in the nucleus accumbens, age differences in response to direct injections of amphetamine into this brain region were investigated in study 2. In contrast to i.p. injections, adolescents were more active than adults when amphetamine was given directly into the nucleus accumbens, indicating that hypoactivity may be attributed to the development of regulatory regions outside of the accumbens.
机译:与成年相比,毒品依赖和成瘾基础上的动机系统的发展重塑可能解释了青少年滥用毒品的频率和严重性更高。动物模型的最新进展已开始识别正在重塑的形态和分子因素,但是对于这些因素在青春期对精神兴奋药(如苯丙胺)的敏感性变化方面的高潮知之甚少。苯丙胺通过中皮层皮质多巴胺系统中多巴胺的释放增加而在啮齿动物中诱导有效的自发激活作用,这使自发运动成为安非他明敏感性年龄差异的有用行为标志。论文的目的是研究苯丙胺敏感性年龄差异的神经基础,重点是伏隔核和前额内侧皮层,分别激活和调节苯丙胺诱导的运动功能。内侧前额叶皮层(mPFC)苯丙胺是苯丙胺在青春期经历广泛重塑的运动激活作用的关键调节剂。在研究3中,我发现一个i.p.注射1.5 mg / kg苯丙胺而不是0.5 mg / kg苯丙胺,只会在青春期前的青春期大鼠mPFC中高表达c-fos(神经激活的标志物)。这一发现表明,与成年相比,青春期大鼠在1.5 mg / kg剂量下克服机能减退的能力可能涉及更大程度地激活前缘mPFC。为支持这一假设,我发现青春期前D1多巴胺受体的药理学抑制作用比成年大鼠更大程度地破坏了1.5 mg / kg剂量苯丙胺的运动活化作用。此外,仅在青春期大鼠中以0.5 mg / kg的苯丙胺刺激前肢D1多巴胺受体增强了运动能力,这表明前肢D1多巴胺受体参与了克服青春期运动机能减退的问题。苯丙胺的激活作用依赖于青春期与成年时稍有不同的机制,研究4旨在确定吸毒的持久后果是否也会随年龄而变化。在青春期大鼠进入成年期后的30天,在青春期(而非成年期)用0.5 mg / kg的苯丙胺进行短暂的预处理会导致对安非他命注射的敏感性提高。苯丙胺敏感性随年龄增长的发现与证据表明,与成年人相比,青春期开始吸毒时成瘾的风险增加(Merline等,2002),并且认为青春期是敏感的在研究1中,我发现青春期前和青春期后大鼠的首次腹膜内注射(ip)剂量为0.5 mg / kg而不是1.5 mg / kg时,其活动能力较弱(即活动不足)。服用苯丙胺。尽管起初是活跃的,但只有青春期大鼠在24小时后第二次注射安非他明时,其活动性增加,这表明青少年可能比成年人对苯丙胺诱导的可塑性的快速变化更为敏感。鉴于苯丙胺的运动活化作用始于伏隔核,因此在研究2中研究了对直接向该脑区域注射苯丙胺作出反应的年龄差异。注射后,将苯丙胺直接注射到伏隔核中时,青少年比成年人更活跃,这表明活动不足可能归因于伏隔外调节区域的发展。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mathews, Iva.;

  • 作者单位

    Brock University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Brock University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Psychology Psychobiology.;Psychology Physiological.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 153 p.
  • 总页数 153
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号