首页> 外文学位 >School district governance and knowledge-fit in decision rights: How districts recruit and hire school librarians.
【24h】

School district governance and knowledge-fit in decision rights: How districts recruit and hire school librarians.

机译:学区的治理和决策权的知识适应:学区如何招募和雇用学校图书馆员。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines the organizational structures and decision-making processes used by school districts to recruit and hire school librarians. For students to acquire the information and technology literacy education they need, school libraries must be staffed with qualified individuals who can fulfill the librarian's role as leader, teacher, instructional partner, information specialist, and program administrator. Principals are typically given decision rights for hiring staff, including school librarians. Research shows that principals have limited knowledge of the skills and abilities of the school librarian or the specific needs and functions of the library program. Research also indicates that those with specific knowledge of school library programs, namely school district library supervisors, are only consulted on recruiting and hiring about half the time. School districts entrust library supervisors with responsibilities such as professional development of school librarians only after they are hired.;This study uses a theoretical lens from research on IT governance, which focuses on the use of knowledge-fit in applying decision rights in an organization. This framework is appropriate because of its incorporation of a specialist with a specific knowledge set in determining the placement of input and decision rights in the decision-making processes. The method used in this research was a multiple-case study design using five school districts as cases, varying by the involvement of the supervisors and other individuals in the hiring process. The data collected from each school district were interviews about the district's recruiting and hiring practices with principals, an individual in HR, library supervisors, and recently hired school librarians. Data analysis was conducted through iterative coding from themes in the research questions, with continuous adjustments as new themes developed.;Results from the study indicate that governance framework is applicable to evaluating the decision-making processes used in recruiting and hiring school librarians. However, a district's use of governance did not consistently use knowledge-fit in the determination of input and decision rights. In the hiring process, governance was more likely to be based on placing decision rights at a certain level of the district hierarchy rather than the location of specific knowledge, most often resulting in site-based governance for decision rights at the school-building level. The governance of the recruiting process was most affected by the shortage or surplus of candidates available to the district to fill positions. Districts struggling with a shortage of candidates typically placed governance for the decision-making process on recruiting at the district level, giving the library supervisor more opportunity for input and collaboration with human resources. In districts that use site-based governance and that place all input and decision rights at the building level, some principals use their autonomy to eliminate the school library position in the allotment phase or hire librarians that, while certified through testing, do not have the same level of expertise as those who achieve certification through LIS programs. The principals in districts who use site-based governance for decision rights but call on the library supervisor for advisement stated how valuable they found the supervisor's expertise in evaluating candidates for hire. In no district was a principal or school required to involve the library supervisor in the hiring of school librarians. With a better understanding of the tasks involved, the effect of district governance on decision-making, and the use of knowledge to assign input and decision rights, it is possible to look at how all of these factors affect the outcome in the quality of the hire. A next step is to look at the hiring process that school librarians went through and connect those with the measurable outcomes of hiring: school librarian success, retention, and attrition; the quality of school library program services, outreach, and involvement in a school; and the perceptions of the success of the school librarian and the library program as seen from students, teachers, administrators, parents, and other community stakeholders.
机译:本研究考察了学区用来招募和雇用学校图书馆员的组织结构和决策过程。为了使学生获得所需的信息和技术素养教育,学校图书馆必须配备合格的人员,这些人员应能够发挥图书馆员的领导,老师,教学合作伙伴,信息专家和计划管理员的作用。校长通常被赋予雇用员工(包括学校图书馆员)的决策权。研究表明,校长对学校图书馆员的技能和能力或图书馆计划的特定需求和功能的了解有限。研究还表明,只有大约一半时间会征询那些具有特定学校图书馆计划知识的人,即学区图书馆主管。学区仅在聘用图书馆主管后才负责图书馆主管的专业发展等工作。本研究使用了IT治理研究的理论视角,该理论着眼于在组织中运用决策权中知识的运用。该框架之所以合适,是因为在确定决策过程中输入和决策权的位置时,由具有特定知识的专家组成。本研究中使用的方法是一个多案例研究设计,以五个学区为例,具体取决于主管和其他人员在招聘过程中的参与程度。从每个学区收集的数据是与校长,人力资源人员,图书馆主管以及最近聘用的学校图书馆员就该学区的招聘和雇用实践进行的访谈。通过对研究问题中的主题进行迭代编码来进行数据分析,并随着新主题的发展而不断进行调整。;研究结果表明,治理框架适用于评估在招聘和雇用学校图书馆员中使用的决策过程。但是,地区对治理的使用在确定投入和决策权时并没有始终使用知识适合性。在招聘过程中,治理更有可能基于将决策权置于地区层次结构的特定级别上,而不是基于特定知识的位置,通常是在学校建设层面对决策权进行基于站点的治理。招聘过程的管理受该地区可填补职位空缺的候选人的短缺或过剩的影响最大。在候选人短缺的情况下苦苦挣扎的地区通常将决策过程的管理放在地区一级的招聘上,这为图书馆主管提供了更多的投入和与人力资源合作的机会。在使用基于站点的治理并且将所有输入和决策权限都置于建筑物级别的地区中,一些校长会利用自己的自治权消除分配阶段的学校图书馆位置,或者雇用经过测试认证但没有资格的图书馆员。与通过LIS计划获得认证的专家一样的专业水平。在使用基于站点的管理来获得决策权的地区中的负责人,但要求图书馆主管提供建议,他们表示,他们发现主管在评估聘用候选人方面的专业知识具有多么宝贵的价值。在任何地区,都没有校长或学校被要求让图书馆主管参与学校图书管理员的雇用。通过更好地了解所涉及的任务,地区治理对决策的影响以及使用知识分配投入和决策权,有可能查看所有这些因素如何影响企业质量的结果。聘请。下一步是研究学校图书馆员经历的招聘过程,并将其与可衡量的招聘结果联系起来:学校图书馆员的成功,保留和减员;学校图书馆计划服务的质量,推广和参与学校的质量;从学生,老师,行政人员,父母和其他社区利益相关者的角度来看,对学校图书馆员和图书馆计划成功的看法。

著录项

  • 作者

    DiScala, Jeffrey Michael.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Maryland, College Park.;

  • 授予单位 University of Maryland, College Park.;
  • 学科 Library science.;Educational administration.;Information science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 265 p.
  • 总页数 265
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:43:49

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号