首页> 外文学位 >Modern men: Taking risks and making masculinity in the postwar years.
【24h】

Modern men: Taking risks and making masculinity in the postwar years.

机译:现代男人:战后时代冒着男性气概。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Postwar Canadian culture explained the predicament of modern men in two contradictory ways. One response suggested that men were the ideal moderns. Traits such as reason, technical ability, and self-discipline were labelled as masculine, and Canadians turned to a variety of male-dominated fields of expertise, including engineering, automobile safety, urban planning, psychiatry, and psychology, to manage modern forms of risk. The other main approach was to suggest the exact opposite, to claim that modern life sapped men of the traits that made them manly. From this perspective, such modern processes as bureaucratization, suburbanization and white-collar work threatened the very basis of masculinity. In "Modern Men" I demonstrate how these two conflicting attitudes resulted from a widespread postwar attempt to "modernize" masculinity, to establish a form of gendered modernity that I call "manly modernism."; "Modern Men" examines how those in one city, Vancouver, responded to various forms of modern risk and the ways in which they connected masculinity with risk-taking and risk-management. Vancouverites' mixed response to the question of what it meant to be a modern man reflected manly modernism's ironic effects. Even as men became the main symbols of postwar modernity, they also became the objects of new forms of discipline and regulation. Although modern expertise was gendered as masculine, many men just as often found themselves the target of discipline from these new professions that, for example, sought to discipline male aggression and restrain overly daring and risky behaviour. Manly modernism justified men's privileges in uneven ways, benefiting some men and some types of masculinity above others and creating unintended consequences by the new ways in which men's social privileges were delivered.; In "Modern Men" I suggest that the unexpected predecessors to 1960s criticisms of modernity were the men from the 1940s and 1950s who themselves found much to criticize in modern notions of masculinity and the modernist project with which it was associated. Rarely gender radicals themselves, their criticism of the manly modern ideal nonetheless helped set the stage for the more sustained criticism which followed.
机译:战后加拿大文化以两种矛盾的方式解释了现代人的困境。一个回应表明,男人是理想的现代人。诸如理性,技术能力和自律之类的特征被标记为男性,加拿大人转向男性主导的各种专业领域,包括工程,汽车安全,城市规划,精神病学和心理学,以管理现代形式的风险。另一种主要方法是提出完全相反的说法,声称现代生活使具有男子气概的人失去个性。从这个角度来看,官僚化,郊区化和白领工作等现代进程威胁着男性气概的根基。在《现代人》中,我展示了这两种相互矛盾的态度是由于战后广泛尝试使男子气概“现代化”,建立一种我称之为“男子气概现代主义”的性别现代性形式而产生的。 《现代人》探讨了温哥华一个城市中的人们如何应对各种形式的现代风险,以及他们如何将男性气概与冒险精神和风险管理联系起来。温哥华人对现代人意味着什么的混合回答反映了男子气概的现代主义的讽刺效果。即使当人成为战后现代性的主要标志时,他们也成为新的纪律和规章形式的对象。尽管现代专业知识被归类为男性,但许多男性却经常从这些新职业中发现自己是纪律的目标,例如,这些纪律旨在规制男性的侵略行为,并抑制过分大胆和冒险的行为。男子气概的现代主义以不同的方式为男人的特权辩护,使某些男人和某些类型的男子气概比其他男人更受惠,并通过赋予男人的社会特权的新方式造成意想不到的后果。在《现代人》中,我建议1960年代对现代性进行批评的出人意料的前辈是1940年代和1950年代的男人,他们本身发现了很多关于现代男性气质概念以及与之相关的现代主义项目的批评。性别激进分子本身很少,他们对男子气概的现代理想的批评为随后的更持久的批评奠定了基础。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dummitt, Christopher.;

  • 作者单位

    Simon Fraser University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Simon Fraser University (Canada).;
  • 学科 History Canadian.; Canadian Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 260 p.
  • 总页数 260
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 加拿大;人口学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号