首页> 外文学位 >America Town: Building the outposts of empire.
【24h】

America Town: Building the outposts of empire.

机译:美国城:建造帝国的前哨基地。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The United States routinely uses military power to impose grand plans for peacekeeping and nation-building. From Korea to Iraq, the U.S. military has been a driving force in this era of American Empire. Given this empire's global reach, what are its local impacts? Crime and environmental contamination are the most obvious. But for many residents living near America's overseas bases or outposts, land use patterns are the most significant concern. While there are ideological critiques to the global presence of the U.S. military, this study offers a critique of empire's spatial dimensions.; In Part I, I analyze how the U.S. marks its territories and discuss the spatial impacts of projecting imperial might. In Part II, I examine how the U.S. applies rigid design practices and inflexible institutional policies to create America Towns across the globe. In Part III, using case studies from Italy, South Korea, and Japan, I show how the U.S. exploits geopolitical events to justify the building and expansion of its outposts. I employ an institutional ethnography using spatial analysis, interviews, surveys, and archival research. This method helps uncover how planners use familiar modes of practice to create familiar models of spatial development.; I posit that in building these outposts, the U.S. has exported suburbia and its sprawling land use patterns, replete with low densities and auto-dependency. Additionally, I suggest that the U.S. has established a new approach to managing its dominion. Empires long ago abandoned policies of assimilation, a model of consciously eliminating the cultures of the colonized. The more recent approach has been association, with empires reluctantly acknowledging the cultural norms of their "hosts." After September 11, avoidance has become the standard. The U.S. military is relocating into the hinterlands and retreating into isolated compounds.; This study shows how imperial cultures transport their socio-spatial practices to diverse geographic settings, regardless of local concerns. This process engraves the military's incessant focus on command and control across the landscape. On America's outposts, underlying superficial attempts at architectural compatibility are policies of fear and desires for familiarity that drastically increase the economic, social, and political costs of empire's reach.
机译:美国通常使用军事力量来实施维持和平与建国的宏伟计划。从朝鲜到伊拉克,美军一直是美国帝国时代的推动力。鉴于这个帝国的全球影响力,它将对当地产生什么影响?犯罪和环境污染最为明显。但是对于居住在美国海外基地或前哨基地附近的许多居民来说,土地使用方式是最重要的问题。尽管对美国军队的全球存在有意识形态的批评,但这项研究对帝国的空间维度提出了批评。在第一部分中,我分析了美国如何标记其领土并讨论了投射帝国力量的空间影响。在第二部分中,我研究了美国如何运用严格的设计实践和不灵活的机构政策在全球范围内创建美国城镇。在第三部分中,我使用来自意大利,韩国和日本的案例研究,展示了美国如何利用地缘政治事件来证明其哨所的建设和扩张是合理的。我聘用了一个机构人种志研究者,进行空间分析,访谈,调查和档案研究。这种方法有助于揭示计划者如何使用熟悉的实践模式来创建熟悉的空间发展模型。我认为,在建设这些前哨基地时,美国已经出口了郊区及其庞大的土地利用模式,并充满了低密度和自给自足的局面。此外,我建议美国建立一种新的方法来管理其统治地位。帝国很久以前就放弃了同化政策,这是一种有意识地消除殖民地文化的模式。最近的方法是联想,帝国不情愿地承认其“主人”的文化规范。 9月11日之后,回避已成为标准。美国军方正在迁入腹地,并撤退到孤立的营地。这项研究表明,帝国主义文化如何将其社会空间实践转移到不同的地理环境,而不受当地的关注。这个过程刻下了军队对整个景观的指挥与控制的不断关注。在美国的前哨基地,建筑兼容性的潜在表面尝试是恐惧和对熟悉的渴望,这些政策大大增加了帝国扩张所需的经济,社会和政治成本。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gillem, Mark L.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Architecture.; Urban and Regional Planning.; Landscape Architecture.; Geography.; American Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 417 p.
  • 总页数 417
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;区域规划、城乡规划;地下建筑;自然地理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号