首页> 外文学位 >Evaluation of the effects of compaction methods on the predicted performance of Superpave mixtures.
【24h】

Evaluation of the effects of compaction methods on the predicted performance of Superpave mixtures.

机译:评估压实方法对Superpave混合物预测性能的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Several compaction methods are used to fabricate specimens for performance testing in the laboratory. As the physical properties of the specimens depend on the method of compaction used for fabrication, the compaction methods adopted in the laboratory should simulate the properties of the pavement in the field. The effects of different compaction methods on the performance of mixtures were investigated in this study. Laboratory compaction methods such as Superpave Gyratory Compaction (SGC) and Rolling Wheel Compaction (RWC) were compared with field compaction. Four field mixtures were selected. Various performance evaluation tests were conducted on the field cores and specimens fabricated using SGC and RWC. The mixtures were evaluated using the Shear tester, the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA) and the NCSU Wheel Tracking Device.; The results indicate that the laboratory compacted mixtures tend to be superior in their performance than the field cores. The laboratory compacted mixtures have higher stiffness values and lower shear strain values than the field cores. The RWC seems to simulate field compaction better than the SGC. A good correlation was found between the results of the Repeated Shear tests at Constant Height tests, the APA tests and the NCSU WTD rut tests. The mixtures which failed to satisfy the RSCH test criteria had rut depths greater than 0.5 inch, as measured by the APA and NCSU WTD. The mixtures that passed the RSCH tests had rut depths less than 0.5 inch. The APA test and the NCSU WTD test can be used as a simulator to examine the rutting susceptibility of a mixture.; The compactability of the mixtures is studied using the SGC, IPC Servopac Compactor and GLPA. The compaction parameters that relate with the rutting behavior of mixtures were compared with the RSCH shear strains at different air void contents. The correlations showed different trends with two sets of parameters with one set measuring the compactability of the mixtures and another set measuring the shear behavior of the mixtures. The compaction parameters measured based on the theory of rate of densification could not satisfactorily predict the rutting behavior of the mixtures.
机译:几种压实方法用于制造用于实验室性能测试的样品。由于样品的物理性质取决于制造中所用的压实方法,因此实验室采用的压实方法应模拟现场路面的性质。在这项研究中,研究了不同压实方法对混合物性能的影响。将实验室压实方法,如Superpave回转压实(SGC)和滚轮压实(RWC)与现场压实进行了比较。选择了四种田间混合物。对使用SGC和RWC制成的现场磁芯和样品进行了各种性能评估测试。使用剪切测试仪,沥青路面分析仪(APA)和NCSU车轮跟踪设备对混合物进行评估。结果表明,实验室压实混合物的性能往往优于现场岩心。实验室压实的混合物比现场岩心具有更高的刚度值和更低的剪切应变值。 RWC似乎比SGC更好地模拟了现场压实。在恒定高度测试中的重复剪切测试,APA测试和NCSU WTD车辙测试之间发现了良好的相关性。通过APA和NCSU WTD测量,不符合RSCH测试标准的混合物的车辙深度大于0.5英寸。通过RSCH测试的混合物的车辙深度小于0.5英寸。 APA测试和NCSU WTD测试可用作模拟器,以检查混合物的车辙敏感性。使用SGC,IPC Servopac压实机和GLPA研究了混合物的压实性。将与混合物的车辙行为相关的压实参数与在不同气隙含量下的RSCH剪切应变进行了比较。相关性显示出两组趋势不同的趋势,一组参数测量混合物的可压实性,另一组参数测量混合物的剪切性能。基于致密化速率理论测量的压实参数不能令人满意地预测混合物的车辙行为。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sadasivam, Suriyanarayanan.;

  • 作者单位

    North Carolina State University.;

  • 授予单位 North Carolina State University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 155 p.
  • 总页数 155
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号