首页> 外文学位 >The Managed Crisis: Labor Relations and Management in California Agriculture, 1930--1980.
【24h】

The Managed Crisis: Labor Relations and Management in California Agriculture, 1930--1980.

机译:可管理的危机:1930--1980年的加利福尼亚农业中的劳资关系和管理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

From the Great Depression of the 1930s to the Great Recession of the 1970s, American agricultural policy institutionalized the notion of agricultural exceptionalism. First, California growers argued the "managed crisis" of the harvest required a flexible and unregulated labor market. Second, California agribusiness represented a middle ground between a yeoman farming tradition and an industrial business model. Many aspects of farming lay completely outside of the control of even the most capable farm operators, regardless of technologically advanced, industrial farming practices. Therefore, growers aggressively pursued business strategies in the hopes of regularizing production and marketing as means of minimizing the gamble of food production. At the same time, they adamantly resisted the decasualization of the farm labor market by either the state or organized farm workers.;However, the commercialization of agriculture made growers more vulnerable to boycotts by the United Farm Workers Union, which forced them to deal with unionism during the late 1960s. Growers temporarily embraced collective bargaining legislation as a way of deradicalizing farm unionism and regaining control over their managerial prerogatives. Although it took twelve years for employers under the National Labor Relations Act to curb organized labor significantly, California agribusiness achieved a similar goal in a matter of months. By the 1980s, innovative agribusiness systems of production and human resource management were no longer exceptional. In fact, California agribusiness labor relations became a model for the managers of non-agricultural American industries.
机译:从1930年代的大萧条到1970年代的大萧条,美国的农业政策使农业例外主义的概念制度化。首先,加利福尼亚的种植者认为收获的“受控危机”需要灵活且不受监管的劳动力市场。其次,加利福尼亚州的农业综合企业代表了约曼人的农业传统与工业商业模式之间的中间地带。不论技术先进的工业化耕作方式如何,耕作的许多方面都完全不受甚至最有能力的农场经营者控制。因此,种植者积极追求商业战略,希望将生产和销售正规化,以将粮食生产的赌注降到最低。同时,他们坚决抵制国家或有组织的农场工人对农场劳动力市场的轻描淡写。然而,农业的商业化使种植者更容易受到联合农场工人联合会的抵制,迫使他们应对1960年代后期的工会主义。种植者暂时接受集体谈判的立法,以此来铲除农业工会主义的根基并重新获得对其管理特权的控制。尽管根据《国家劳资关系法》,雇主用了十二年时间来大量遏制有组织的劳工,但加州的农业综合企业在短短几个月内就实现了类似目标。到1980年代,生产和人力资源管理的创新农业综合企业系统已经不再是例外。实际上,加利福尼亚州的农业企业劳资关系成为美国非农业行业管理者的榜样。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lamoree, Elizabeth Anne.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Santa Barbara.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Santa Barbara.;
  • 学科 History United States.;Sociology Industrial and Labor Relations.;Economics Agricultural.;Agriculture General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 517 p.
  • 总页数 517
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号