首页> 外文学位 >Estimation of marginal benefits of antibiotic treatment for otitis media in Iowa Medicaid children using instrumental variable techniques.
【24h】

Estimation of marginal benefits of antibiotic treatment for otitis media in Iowa Medicaid children using instrumental variable techniques.

机译:使用仪器可变技术估算爱荷华州医疗补助儿童中耳炎的抗生素治疗的边际效益。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background. In the past several years, antibiotics have been considered overused for otitis media (OM). The Iowa Department of Public Health (IDPH) conducted an educational intervention on August 30, 1999 to reduce antibiotic use. A recent study reported the IDPH intervention contributed to reduction of antibiotic use by 20% in Medicaid population. However, it is not known whether this intervention lowered antibiotic use for OM patients and how many OM patients were not cured as a result of the intervention.; Objectives. This study identifies whether the IDPH intervention and physician supply per capita had a significant influence on antibiotic choice for OM in the Iowa Medicaid children from 1997 through 2002, assesses the validity of using the variable of the IDPH intervention and physician supply per capita as an instrument, and estimates average treatment benefits of antibiotics relative to watchful-waiting for marginal OM children using instrumental variable techniques with a valid instrument.; Methods. The Iowa Medicaid Claims database was used to analyze across the patient demographics, comorbidities, the years and seasons at diagnosis, physician specialty, physician supply, and the IDPH intervention. The study population consisted of 36,585 children less than 13 years of age with the index OM between August, 1996 and August, 2002.; Results. Physician supply per capita were significantly associated with the probability of receiving antibiotic treatment for OM (p 0.0001) but not the IDPH intervention (p = 0.94). Antibiotics were more likely prescribed for the OM patients living in areas with higher physician supply per capita (OR = 1.154, 95% CI = 1.094--1.217). Physician supply per capita was found to be able to use as an instrument but not the IDPH intervention. The antibiotic treatment relative to watchful-waiting for marginal OM patients whose treatment choices were affected by difference in physician supply per capita was not significantly effective (antibiotic effectiveness = 4.94%, 95% CI = -0.25%--0.35%).; Conclusions. Physician supply had an effect on antibiotic choice for OM. If the marginal patients represented patients who did not receive antibiotics as a result of the IDPH intervention, lowering antibiotic use would not have decreased antibiotic benefits among OM children in Iowa Medicaid.
机译:背景。在过去的几年中,抗生素被认为是中耳炎(OM)的过度使用。爱荷华州公共卫生部(IDPH)于1999年8月30日进行了教育干预,以减少抗生素的使用。最近的一项研究报道,IDPH干预措施使医疗补助人群的抗生素使用减少了20%。但是,尚不知道这种干预是否会降低OM患者的抗生素使用率,以及有多少OM患者由于干预而无法治愈。目标。这项研究确定了IDPH干预和人均医生供应量是否对1997年至2002年爱荷华州医疗补助儿童的OM抗生素选择有重大影响,评估了使用IDPH干预和人均医生供应量变量作为工具的有效性,并通过使用有效工具的工具可变技术,估计相对于等待边缘性OM儿童的抗生素平均治疗收益。方法。爱荷华州医疗补助索赔数据库用于分析患者的人口统计资料,合并症,诊断的年份和季节,医师专长,医师供应以及IDPH干预。研究人群包括1996年8月至2002年8月之间的OM指数为OM的36585名13岁以下的儿童。结果。人均医师供应量与接受OM抗生素治疗的可能性显着相关(p <0.0001),而与IDPH干预无关(p = 0.94)。生活在人均医师供应较高的地区的OM患者更可能开出抗生素处方(OR = 1.154,95%CI = 1.094--1.217)。发现人均医师供应量可作为一种手段,但不能用作IDPH干预手段。抗生素治疗相对于边缘等待的OM患者而言,其治疗选择受人均医师供应差异的影响并不明显(抗生素有效性= 4.94%,95%CI = -0.25%-0.35%)。结论。医师的供应对OM的抗生素选择有影响。如果边缘患者代表由于IDPH干预而未接受抗生素治疗的患者,则在爱荷华州医疗补助的OM儿童中,降低抗生素使用率不会降低抗生素的获益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Park, Tae-Ryong.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Iowa.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Iowa.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Pharmacy.; Health Sciences Health Care Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 150 p.
  • 总页数 150
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 药剂学;预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号