首页> 外文学位 >The effectiveness of a Digital Citizenship curriculum in an urban school.
【24h】

The effectiveness of a Digital Citizenship curriculum in an urban school.

机译:城市学校中数字公民课程的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Misuse of technology is a behavioral pattern that continues to emerge in our society. Television and newspapers continue to list and report technology misuse. A recent study from the Pew Internet and American Life Project has indicated approximately one third of teen are victims of online harassment (Lenhart, 2009). Other prominent problems with regard to technology misuse include: internet plagiarism, hacking into school servers, illegally downloading music, accessing pornographic Web sites, and playing video games during class time (Ribble & Bailey, 2004). While the misuse of digital technology has many underlying causes, it would seem reasonable to suggest that the lack of education is a contributing factor (Ribble, 2004). Education, specifically the offering of a digital citizen curriculum, and its influence on the use of technology, is addressed by this research.;A basic tenet of our educational system is to provide an educated citizenship as proposed by James Madison in The Federalists Papers. This concept is as important today as it was years ago when the founders proposed our democratic republic. The misuse of technology is not in congruence with good citizenship.;The research question addressed: Does exposure to Digital Citizenship Influence the normative behavior of students as it relates to the use of technology?;The goal of this quasi-experimental research is two-fold: to add to the limited research pertaining to Digital Citizenship and to measure the influence on use/misuse of technology a Digital Citizenship curriculum adapted and implemented at an urban school located in the Northeast based upon the guide created by Ribble & Bailey (2004).;Participants in the study included students (treatment group, n = 75) exposed to the curriculum and students (control group, n = 75) not exposed to the curriculum. Instrumentation used in the study was based on Ribble's (2004) "Digital Driver's License" for secondary students. The researcher administered the Ribble (2004) licensed instrument as both pre and post tests/surveys.;Data indicated a significant difference in students' normative behavior of technology use when exposed to the Digital Citizenship curriculum. The areas of gain were Digital Etiquette (Group B, F=29.301, p=.000, m=.64, Group A, m=.24), Digital Communication (Group B, F=6.402, p=.012, m=.68, Group A, m=.55), Digital Literacy (Group B, F=4.722, p=.031, m=.73, Group A, m=.64), Digital Commerce (Group B, F=5.619, p=.019, m=.67, Group A, m=.49), Digital Law (Group B, F=4.880, p=.029, m=.65 Group A, m=.45), Digital Rights and Responsibilities (Group B, F=11.86, p=.001, m=.72, Group A, m=.48, and Digital Health and Wellness (Group B, F=28.140 p=.000, m=60 Group A, m=.20).;Based on the study's outcomes, more research is needed targeting technology usage. The data collected provides a foundation for further study which will help our educational leaders address curricula issues involving ethical technology use in our schools and home.
机译:技术滥用是一种在我们社会中不断出现的行为模式。电视和报纸继续列出并报告技术滥用情况。皮尤互联网和美国生活项目的一项最新研究表明,大约三分之一的青少年是网络骚扰的受害者(Lenhart,2009年)。关于技术滥用的其他突出问题包括:互联网internet窃,入侵学校服务器,非法下载音乐,访问色情网站以及在上课时间玩视频游戏(Ribble&Bailey,2004)。尽管滥用数字技术有许多根本原因,但似乎很合理地认为缺乏教育是一个促成因素(Ribble,2004)。本研究解决了教育,特别是提供数字公民课程及其对技术使用的影响。;我们的教育系统的基本原则是,提供詹姆斯·麦迪逊在《联邦主义者论文》中提出的受过教育的公民身份。今天,这个概念与几年前的创始人提议建立我们的民主共和国一样重要。技术的滥用与良好的公民身份并不相称。研究的问题在于:暴露于数字公民身份是否会影响与技术使用相关的学生的规范行为?准实验研究的目的是两个方面: fold:增加关于数字公民身份的有限研究,并衡量对数字技术的使用/滥用的影响,基于Ribble&Bailey(2004)创建的指南,在东北的城市学校改编并实施了数字公民身份课程..研究的参与者包括暴露于课程的学生(治疗组,n = 75)和未暴露于课程的学生(对照组,n = 75)。研究中使用的仪器是基于Ribble(2004年)针对中学生的“数字驾驶执照”。研究人员将Ribble(2004)许可的仪器作为测试前和测试后/调查后的数据进行管理;数据表明,在接触数字公民课程时,学生对技术使用的规范行为存在显着差异。增益区域是数字礼节(B组,F = 29.301,p = .000,m = .64,组A,m = .24),数字通信(B组,F = 6.402,p = .012,m = .68,A组,m = .55),数字素养(B组,F = 4.722,p = .031,m = .73,A组,m = .64),数字商务(B组,F = 5.619,p = .019,m = .67,A组,m = .49),数字法则(B组,F = 4.880,p = .029,m = .65 A组,m = .45),数字权利和责任(B组,F = 11.86,p = .001,m = .72,A组,m = .48,数字健康与保健(B组,F = 28.140 p = .000,m = 60组) A,m = .20).;根据研究结果,需要针对技术使用进行更多研究,收集的数据为进一步研究奠定了基础,这将有助于我们的教育领导者解决涉及学校和家庭中伦理技术使用的课程问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Boyle, Clifton J., III.;

  • 作者单位

    Johnson & Wales University.;

  • 授予单位 Johnson & Wales University.;
  • 学科 Ethics.;Education Technology of.;Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 104 p.
  • 总页数 104
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号