首页> 外文学位 >Safe European home: European war and interdependence
【24h】

Safe European home: European war and interdependence

机译:安全的欧洲家园:欧洲战争与相互依存

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In early August 2008, Georgia invaded its province of South Ossetia and sparked a brief interstate war when Russia decided to defend its provincial neighbors in South Ossetia and Abkhazia. The European Union (EU), mainly represented by the Council Presidency of French President Nicholas Sarkozy, diplomatically intervened on Georgia's behalf. The EU's intervention represented a critical challenge for that institution and its intervention is judged as a qualified success. Before a ceasefire put forth by the EU was implemented, Georgia had sustained heavy casualties compared to Russia and its government was swiftly crippled. Left to its own devices, it is nearly inconceivable that the Georgian leadership could have gained better terms in the ceasefire negotiations than those terms that the EU negotiated on its behalf. When hostilities ended, the Georgian government remained intact with its formal sovereignty upheld while Russian troops evicted themselves from Georgia's non-secessionist territory.;This thesis argues that the EU's intervention during the crisis was surprisingly successful and was dependent on the EU's regime of European interdependence, facilitated by institutional association and economic ties between the EU, Georgia, and Russia. The prospect of eventual EU membership yoked the Georgian leadership to the reform expectations that the EU set forth. Georgia believed that its destiny lay in Europe and that eventual yet distant membership was a relatively plausible outcome based on statements and actions by Georgian officials and their EU counterparts. The possibility of EU membership for Georgia constituted a normative ability on the part of the EU's partnership and enlargement scheme to translate functions of regional stability and conflict management to the Georgian nation state. Russia's belligerence during the conflict and its willingness to negotiate with the EU was a function of that country's deep and interdependent economic ties with the EU and its members, as well as an embryonic but functioning form of EU association.
机译:2008年8月上旬,当俄罗斯决定捍卫南奥塞梯和阿布哈兹的省邻时,格鲁吉亚入侵了其南奥塞梯省,并引发了短暂的州际战争。主要由法国总统尼古拉斯·萨科齐担任安理会主席的欧洲联盟代表格鲁吉亚进行外交干预。欧盟的干预对该机构构成了严峻挑战,其干预被认为是成功的。在欧盟实施停火之前,与俄罗斯相比,格鲁吉亚的人员伤亡惨重,其政府也因此迅速瘫痪。撇开自己的立场,格鲁吉亚领导人在停火谈判中获得的条件要好于欧盟代表其谈判的条件,这几乎是不可想象的。敌对行动结束后,格鲁吉亚政府仍保持其正式主权不变,而俄罗斯军队则从格鲁吉亚的非割据主义领土上撤离。;本论文认为,欧盟在危机期间的干预取得了令人惊讶的成功,并且取决于欧盟的欧洲相互依存制度,由欧盟,格鲁吉亚和俄罗斯之间的机构协会和经济联系推动。最终加入欧盟的前景使格鲁吉亚领导人对欧盟提出的改革期望表示敬意。格鲁吉亚认为,自己的命运掌握在欧洲,而根据格鲁吉亚官员及其欧盟同行的声明和行动,最终但距离遥远的会员国是一个相对合理的结果。欧盟加入格鲁吉亚的可能性构成了欧盟伙伴关系和扩大计划中将区域稳定和冲突管理职能转变为格鲁吉亚民族国家的规范能力。俄罗斯在冲突期间的好战态度以及与欧盟进行谈判的意愿,是该国与欧盟及其成员国之间深厚而相互依存的经济联系的结果,也是欧盟协会的雏形但起作用的形式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Healey, Steven Brock.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Colorado at Denver.;

  • 授予单位 University of Colorado at Denver.;
  • 学科 Political science.;International relations.;European studies.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 94 p.
  • 总页数 94
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 石油、天然气工业;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号