首页> 外文学位 >Instructional behaviors and student reading outcomes in a scripted Tier 2 intervention for fourth grade struggling readers
【24h】

Instructional behaviors and student reading outcomes in a scripted Tier 2 intervention for fourth grade struggling readers

机译:针对四年级奋斗读者的脚本化方法2干预中的教学行为和学生阅读结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examined instructors' spontaneous responses to student errors in a scripted Tier 2 reading intervention and the relationship between tutor responses and student comprehension outcomes. A sequential exploratory mixed-methods design was used to identify the types of behaviors tutors exhibited in response to student errors, using transcripts of lessons. Tutors used four types of off-script behaviors when reacting to students: (a) scaffolding, (b) telling, (c) unclear feedback, and (d) erroneous feedback. Differences in how tutors implemented the standard protocol were analyzed qualitatively and described using frequency counts. Tutors exhibited differences in the frequencies of each of the behaviors, and differed in how closely they adhered to scripted lesson. Although tutors overall exhibited 76.3% fidelity of implementation, certain components of the lessons were frequently omitted---modeling of the strategy, describing the purpose of the strategy, and providing opportunities for practice. These omissions may have influenced overall responsiveness for students receiving intervention. To determine how tutor differences might influence student outcomes, the frequency counts of the four spontaneous tutor behaviors were entered into regression equations to predict posttest scores on three measures of reading comprehension---Maze, Gates MacGinitie, and ASKIT. Findings indicate that scaffolding was related to student growth on one curriculum based measure of reading comprehension. The other three behaviors---telling, unclear feedback, and erroneous feedback---were not significantly related to student outcomes. Limitations, in light of these findings are considered. Implications for planning intervention studies and tutor training, as well as future directions for research, are discussed.
机译:这项研究检查了教师在脚本化的第二层阅读干预中对学生错误的自发反应以及导师反应与学生理解能力之间的关系。顺序探索性的混合方法设计用于使用课程成绩单来确定教师针对学生的错误而表现出的行为类型。老师在对学生做出反应时使用了四种类型的脚本外行为:(a)脚手架,(b)讲故事,(c)不清楚的反馈和(d)错误的反馈。定性分析了教师实施标准协议的方式差异,并使用频率计数进行了描述。导师在每种行为的频率上表现出差异,并且在遵循脚本课程方面的紧密程度也有所不同。尽管总体上讲师的执行忠诚度为76.3%,但课程的某些组成部分经常被忽略-策略模型,描述策略的目的以及提供实践的机会。这些遗漏可能影响了接受干预的学生的整体反应能力。为了确定导师之间的差异如何影响学生的学习成绩,将四种自发导师行为的频率计数输入回归方程,以预测三种阅读理解量的测验分数:-迷宫,盖茨·麦金妮特和阿斯克特。研究结果表明,在一种基于课程的阅读理解量度中,脚手架与学生的成长有关。其他三种行为-讲述,不清楚的反馈和错误的反馈-与学生的学习成绩没有显着关系。鉴于这些发现,考虑了局限性。讨论了对计划干预研究和导师培训的意义以及未来的研究方向。

著录项

  • 作者

    Montanaro, Elizabeth Ann.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Maryland, College Park.;

  • 授予单位 University of Maryland, College Park.;
  • 学科 Reading instruction.;Special education.;Elementary education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 265 p.
  • 总页数 265
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号