首页> 外文学位 >Performing the Lied, performing the self: Singing subjectivity in Germany, 1790--1832.
【24h】

Performing the Lied, performing the self: Singing subjectivity in Germany, 1790--1832.

机译:表演谎言,表演自我:德国的演唱主观性,1790--1832。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study analyzes salon and concert performances of Lieder (German art songs) in Germany between 1790 and 1832, which often involved major figures in German literary Romanticism (including Friedrich Schleiermacher and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe) as well as the composers and elite intellectual circles most closely associated with them. I argue that performances of Lieder brought to life important but often under-recognized currents in German thought around 1800 concerning the nature of the individual. Although Romantic discussions of subjectivity and the art song genre emphasized the self's inward orientation and isolated core, my research demonstrates that actual performances of Lieder questioned the veracity and cultural centrality of such autonomy. Song performances fostered a surprising permeability between isolation and community, between expression rooted in self or other, and between private and public utterances correspondingly, they worked---and arguably still work---to underscore the mobile nature of individuals' positions on the continuum of autonomy, intersubjectivity, and community. Additionally, this dissertation draws heavily on previously unexplored archival materials concerning performance contexts and musical practices, bringing new historical information to light about the specific details of social and musical practices that affected song performances during the period.Part One of the dissertation, entitled Free Sociability (containing Chapters One and Two), shows that performing Lieder among friends could provide just as often for an increased ease of communication and self-exploration as it could for the retreat of the self from sociable openness such distinctions often fell along gendered lines. Chapter One, "Free Sociability in Theory and Practice," introduces, contextualizes and critiques Friedrich Schleiermacher's notion of free sociability, a key tenet in early German Romanticism. Schleiermacher, who was a frequent visitor to Berlin's salons, outlined this ideal and steps towards achieving it in his 1799 treatise, Towards a Theory of Sociable Conduct, painting the ideal salon as a place where individuals can fully express themselves through the "free play" of their faculties while broadening the sphere of their understanding through their interactions with others. In so doing, he provided an exciting external, sociable, and thus intersubjective extension to an existing Kantian and Schillerian aesthetics that called for the "free play" of an individual's faculties. Chapter Two, "Sociability and the Stugemann Schone Mullerin, or, Free Play in the Biedermeierzeit," analyzes this ideal's promises and limits (especially with regards to gender) against the 1816-17 performance of the Schone Mullerin Liederspiel in the salon of Elisabeth von Stagemann. The chapter focuses on the divergent performances of Wilhelm Muller and Luise Hensel and examines their poems and the music of their salon collaborator, Ludwig Berger.Part Two, Autonomous Subjectivity (which contains Chapters Three and Four), questions the tenability of Goethe's notion of autonomy as presented throughout his writings. This section interrogates, especially, the degree to which singers approaching his Lied poetry could be expected to keep the input of author, composer, work, and performer safely distinct from one another in performance. Chapter Three, "Autonomy in Wilhelm Meister, the Goethean Lyric, Schiller's Aesthetic Education, and the Goethe-Cult," explains the pervasive reach of subjective autonomy in the work of Goethe and Schiller, as well as its strong hold upon the minds of their closest followers in the Weimar and Berlin salons the chapter also points to parallel notions concerning the physical and organic roots of subjectivity that contain the potential to challenge many of Goethe's and Schiller's central claims. Chapter Four, "Carl Friedrich Zelter's Goethe Lieder and the Messa di Voce , or, Breathed Subjectivity and the Limits of Autonomy," considers how Carl Friedrich Zelter's settings of Goethe's poems, which emphasized breath-expression markings to an unusual degree, were ostensibly designed to present the autonomous and inner utterances of the poetic personae within Goethe's poems. These markings, nonetheless, left much-contested room for the performer to find the source of expression, alternately, in him- or herself, the poet, or somewhere in between.Part Three, Desecrating Intimacy (which contains Chapter Five), illuminates the previously obscure early years of Lied performances on public concerts, making clear exactly what repertoire first appeared in this context and showing how such performances confused the boundary between the intimate and the public self, demanding that the performer creatively mediate between them for an increasingly separated audience. Chapter Five, "Sehnsucht, Interiority, Intimacy, and Publicity in the Early Public Performance of the Lied," investigates how even the most apparently "private" of Lied texts, which explore the inner feeling of Sehnsucht (longing), were performed in highly "public" contexts (often with expanded and publicizing musical settings to match, e.g. in settings by Beethoven, Andreas Romberg, and Gasparo Spontini), calling into question any strict contemporary division between public and private modes of expression.
机译:这项研究分析了1790年至1832年在德国举行的Lieder(德国艺术歌曲)的沙龙和音乐会表演,其中经常涉及德国文学浪漫主义的主要人物(包括Friedrich Schleiermacher和Johann Wolfgang von Goethe)以及作曲家和精英知识分子与他们密切相关。我认为,里德(Lieder)的表演使生活变得重要,但在1800年前后德国思想中关于个体的本质却经常被人们忽视。尽管关于主观性和艺术歌曲流派的浪漫主义讨论强调了自我的内向取向和孤立的核心,但我的研究表明,里德的实际表现质疑这种自治的准确性和文化中心性。歌唱表演在隔离和社区之间,在植根于自我或其他方面的表达之间以及在私人和公共话语之间产生了令人惊讶的渗透性,它们相应地起作用(并且可以说仍然起作用),以强调个人在社交场所的流动性。自治,主体间性和社区的连续性。此外,本论文主要借鉴了以前未曾探索过的有关表演环境和音乐实践的档案材料,为这一时期影响歌曲表演的社会和音乐实践的具体细节提供了新的历史信息。论文的第一部分,自由交往(包含第一章和第二章)表明,在朋友中表演撒谎可以增加交流和自我探索的便利,也可以使自我从社交开放中退缩,而这种区别常常落在性别的界限上。第一章“理论和实践中的自由交往”介绍,情境化和批评弗里德里希·施莱尔马赫关于自由交往的概念,这是德国早期浪漫主义的主要宗旨。施莱尔马赫(Schleiermacher)经常光顾柏林的沙龙,在其1799年的专着《善于交际的理论》中概述了这一理想,并朝着实现这一目标迈出了一步,将理想的沙龙描绘成个人可以通过“自由活动”充分表达自己的地方。通过与他人的互动来拓宽他们的理解范围。通过这样做,他为现有的康德式和席勒式美学提供了令人振奋的外部性,社交性和主体间性的扩展,这些美学要求个体的才能“自由发挥”。第二章,“社交性和Stugemann Schone Mullerin,或Biedermeierzeit中的自由玩耍”,分析了这一理想的承诺和局限性(尤其是在性别方面)与Schone Mullerin Liederspiel在伊丽莎白·冯·沙龙中1816-17年的表现有关Stagemann。本章重点讨论威廉·穆勒(Wilhelm Muller)和路易丝·汉塞尔(Luise Hensel)的不同表现,并考察他们的诗歌和沙龙合作者路德维希·伯格(Ludwig Berger)的音乐。第二部分,自主主体性(包含第三章和第四章),对歌德的自治概念的持久性提出质疑。在他的所有著作中都有介绍。本节将特别询问歌手接近其谎言诗歌的程度,以使作者,作曲家,作品和表演者的输入在表演上可以安全地彼此区分。第三章“威廉·梅斯特的自主权,歌德的抒情诗,席勒的审美教育和歌德崇拜”,解释了歌德和席勒作品中主观自治的广泛普及,以及它们在思想上的强大影响力。在魏玛和柏林沙龙中最亲密的追随者中,本章还指出了有关主观性的物理和有机根源的平行概念,这些概念可能会挑战歌德和席勒的许多核心主张。第四章,“卡尔·弗里德里希·泽尔特的歌德谎言和气息的主体性和自治性”,考虑了卡尔·弗里德里希·泽尔特对歌德诗歌的设置,这在很大程度上强调了呼气表情标记,表面上是这样设计的。在歌德的诗歌中展现诗意人物的自主和内在话语。尽管如此,这些标记仍然给表演者留下了颇有争议的空间,使表演者可以在他或她自己,诗人或两者之间的某个地方找到表达的来源。第三部分,亵渎亲密感(包含第五章)阐明了以前掩盖了Lied在公共音乐会上的早期表演,弄清楚了在这种情况下首次出现的曲目是什么,并说明了这种表演如何混淆亲密和公众自我之间的界限,要求表演者创造性地进行调解,以适应越来越分散的观众。第五章“谎言的早期公开表演中的Sehnsucht,内在性,亲密性和宣传性””,调查甚至在高度“公开”的环境中(甚至经常在扩大和宣传的音乐环境中进行匹配,例如在贝多芬的环境中)如何演绎甚至最明显的“私密”谎言文本(探究塞纳切特的内向感)。 ,Andreas Romberg和Gasparo Spontini),质疑公共和私人表达方式之间的任何严格的当代划分。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ronyak, Jennifer Marie.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Rochester, Eastman School of Music.;

  • 授予单位 University of Rochester, Eastman School of Music.;
  • 学科 Literature Germanic.Music.Aesthetics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 322 p.
  • 总页数 322
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:17

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号