首页> 外文学位 >Erasmus of Rotterdam's influence upon Anabaptism: The case of Balthasar Hubmaier.
【24h】

Erasmus of Rotterdam's influence upon Anabaptism: The case of Balthasar Hubmaier.

机译:鹿特丹的伊拉斯mus对洗礼的影响:巴尔塔萨·哈迈迈尔案。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Reformation historians have long debated the question of Erasmus' influence upon Anabaptism. Research, however, has paid insufficient attention to Balthasar Hubmaier (1480--1528), the earliest Anabaptist theologian, and no one has attempted a substantial analysis of Erasmus' influence on him with attention to the problem of influence.;Erasmus' Paraphrase on Matthew (1522) attracted contemporary criticism and modern speculation for its supposed Anabaptist tendencies. In an attempt to determine Erasmian influence, this study compares Erasmus' and Hubmaier's interpretations of important passages in Matthew and places them within the context of key patristic, medieval, and sixteenth-century commentators. Erasmus' exegesis of the Great Commission (Matthew 28:19--20) stresses pre-baptismal instruction in ways uncommon in the exegetical tradition and Hubmaier employed the same interpretation to oppose infant baptism. Unlike most commentators, Erasmus interpreted the parable of the tares (Matthew 13:24--30; 36--43) as promoting the toleration of heretics and the same argument formed the basis of Hubmaier's On Heretics (1524). Erasmus' interpretation of the keys of the kingdom (Matthew 16:15--20; 18:15--20) deemphasized the primacy of Peter, connected the keys with Christian initiation, and laicized the process of excommunication, but Hubmaier underscored other aspects of the passage.;Comparative exegesis suggests Erasmus influenced Hubmaier's interpretation of the Great Commission and the parable of the tares, but not his view of the keys of the Kingdom. Erasmus was not an Anabaptist, nor was he responsible for Anabaptism, but the evidence highlights the potentially radical ramifications of his biblical exegesis and raises again the issue of reception as important to a full appreciation of his legacy. Recourse to Erasmus' exegesis could illumine other aspects of Hubmaier's thought and help explain elements of Anabaptism.;Hubmaier's formal theological training and popularity as a preacher made contact possible with humanists and Erasmus. Evidence from his Waldshut pastorate indicates a rejection of scholasticism in favour of humanism and special esteem for Erasmus. He met Erasmus in Basel in 1522 at a decisive point of his religious conversion and referred to him in his later writings, indicating knowledge of his major works. Hubmaier was clearly in a position to be influenced by Erasmus.
机译:改革史学家长期以来一直在争论伊拉斯mus对洗礼的影响。然而,研究并没有对最早的再洗礼神学家巴尔塔萨·胡拜迈尔(1480--1528)给予足够的重视,并且没有人试图对伊拉斯mus对他的影响进行实质性分析,而只关注其影响问题。马修(1522)因其所谓的洗礼倾向而引起了当代批评和现代猜测。为了确定伊斯拉姆人的影响力,本研究比较了伊拉斯姆斯和胡拜麦尔对《马修》中重要段落的解释,并将其置于重要的爱国主义,中世纪和十六世纪评论家的语境中。伊拉斯mus对大使命的训ex(马太福音28:19--20)强调了洗礼前的教导,这在训tradition传统中是不常见的,胡贝尔迈尔采用了相同的解释来反对婴儿洗礼。与大多数评论员不同的是,伊拉斯mus将interpreted子的寓言(马太福音13:24--30; 36--43)解释为促进了对异端的容忍,而同样的论点构成了胡迈迈尔《异端论》(1524)的基础。伊拉斯mus(Erasmus)对国度之钥的解释(马太福音16:15--20; 18:15--20)不再强调彼得的至高无上性,将其与基督教的启蒙联系在一起,并使被驱逐出境的过程化为乌有,但胡迈尔强调了其他方面比较释经法表明,伊拉斯mus斯影响了哈伯迈尔对大使命和tar子寓言的解释,但没有影响他对王国钥匙的看法。伊拉斯mus既不是再洗礼派,也不负责再洗礼,但是证据突出了他的圣经训诫的潜在根本后果,并再次提出了接受的问题,这对于充分理解他的遗产至关重要。求助于伊拉斯mus斯的训could法可能会启发哈伯迈尔思想的其他方面,并有助于解释再洗礼的内容。乌布迈尔的正规神学训练和作为传道士的声望使与人文主义者和伊拉斯mus斯的接触成为可能。他的Waldshut牧师的证据表明,拒绝接受学术主义,而赞成人文主义和对伊拉斯mus的特殊尊敬。 1522年,他在宗教信仰转变的决定性时刻在巴塞尔遇到了伊拉斯mus,并在后来的著作中提到了他,这说明了他对主要作品的了解。 Hubmaier显然可以受到伊拉斯mus的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Williamson, Darren T.;

  • 作者单位

    Simon Fraser University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Simon Fraser University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Religion History of.;Theology.;Religion Philosophy of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 245 p.
  • 总页数 245
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 能源与动力工程;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号