首页> 外文学位 >A Life of One's Own: Freedom and Obligation in the Novels of Henry James.
【24h】

A Life of One's Own: Freedom and Obligation in the Novels of Henry James.

机译:自己的一生:亨利·詹姆斯小说中的自由与义务。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation argues that the novels of Henry James offer a conception of personhood and of human freedom better able to explain and unify private law than the conceptions currently dominant in private law theory. I begin by laying out the two conceptual frameworks that now dominate private law theory: Kantian right and the feminist ethic of care. I argue that Kantian right’s exclusive focus on respect for freedom of choice makes it unable to explain private law doctrines founded upon concern for human well-being, including unjust enrichment, unconscionability, and liability for negligence. However, feminism’s ethic of care, which can be understood as a response to the Kantian abstraction from considerations of well-being and need, is also incomplete, because its understanding of the person as essentially connected to others fails to respect human separateness. I then offer readings of James’ novels—The Portrait of a Lady, What Maisie Knew, and The Ambassadors—that show how vindicating individual worth requires both respect for abstract agency’s separateness and freedom to choose, on the one hand, and concern for the dependent individual’s well-being and autonomous flourishing, on the other. I argue that these two ideas are complementary parts of a complete understanding of human dignity and freedom. Finally, I argue that this understanding illuminates doctrines of private law that remain mysterious on the Kantian account while avoiding feminism’s tendency to immerse private law in public law.
机译:本文认为,与目前在私法理论中占主导地位的观念相比,亨利·詹姆斯的小说提供了一种人格和人类自由的观念,能够更好地解释和统一私法。首先,我提出两个现在主导着私法理论的概念框架:康德权利和女权主义护理伦理。我认为,康德权利专心于尊重选择自由,使其无法解释基于对人类福祉的关注而建立的私法学说,包括不当得利,不合情理和过失责任。但是,女权主义的护理伦理也可以说是不完整的,因为它对康德人从幸福和需要的角度出发的抽象是对它的理解,因为它对人的本质理解是不尊重人的分离性。然后,我提供詹姆斯小说的读物(夫人的画像 What Maisie Knew 大使),它们显示了如何证明个人价值一方面要求尊重抽象机构的独立性和选择自由,另一方面又要关注受抚养人的福祉和自主发展。我认为这两个想法是对人类尊严与自由的完整理解的补充部分。最后,我认为这种理解阐明了对康德主义而言仍然神秘的私法学说,同时避免了女权主义将私法融入公法的趋势。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Law.;Literature English.;Literature American.
  • 学位 S.J.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 259 p.
  • 总页数 259
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号