首页> 外文学位 >Problems of provision, externality and efficiency, and the case of coalition-based invasive weed management in the southwest.
【24h】

Problems of provision, externality and efficiency, and the case of coalition-based invasive weed management in the southwest.

机译:供应,外部性和效率问题,以及西南部基于联盟的入侵性杂草管理案例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Drawing on institutional and economic insights, this dissertation addressed three fundamental problems in the context of invasive weed management---provision, externality, and efficiency. It was hypothesized that characterizing these three problems and linking management directly to them could be one possible way of successfully managing invasive weeds. The existence and emergence of invasive weed coalitions provided a wonderful opportunity to investigate whether successful invasive weed management corresponds to the successful management of the identified problems.;Chapter 2 characterized the invasive weed provision problem. Using a game theory approach, this chapter numerically illustrates and mathematically proves that private provision of weed control at equilibrium may not necessarily equate to the social optimal level of weed control provision. A coalition-based invasive management strategy was suggested as an appropriate mechanism to foster cooperative behavior and joint provision.;Chapter 3 addressed provision and externality problems in existing invasive weed coalitions by using the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. Findings from focus group discussions revealed coalitions were effective at providing weed control strategies and at reducing the infestations across property boundaries.;Chapter 4 dealt with the efficiency problem through the development of the Least-Cost-Plus-Net-Loss model. Using information from a weed coalition known as the Lindrith Project and some model inputs, several economically efficient treatment strategies were identified, which varied from one scenario to the other.;This study provided direct and immediately useful policy inputs that can be used to design coalitions to achieve effective, efficient, and successful long-term invasive weed management and could potentially fill the gap between regulatory authority and enforcement. However, it is important to remember that mere creation of coalition does not guarantee that it can evolve over time nor that it can well take care of invasive problems. Flaws in designing a coalition could be costly and may cause unwanted results.
机译:本文利用制度和经济方面的见解,解决了入侵性杂草管理背景下的三个基本问题:供应,外部性和效率。据推测,表征这三个问题并将管理直接联系到它们可能是成功处理入侵性杂草的一种可能方法。入侵性杂草联盟的存在和出现为探讨成功的入侵性杂草管理是否与确定的问题的成功管理相对应提供了绝好的机会。第二章,入侵性杂草供应问题的特征。本章使用博弈论方法对数字进行了说明,并在数学上证明了平衡状态下对杂草控制的私人提供不一定等于对杂草控制提供的社会最优水平。建议以联盟为基础的入侵管理策略作为促进合作行为和联合供应的适当机制。第三章通过使用制度分析和发展框架解决了现有入侵性杂草联盟的供应和外部性问题。焦点小组讨论的结果表明,联盟在提供杂草控制策略和减少跨财产边界的侵扰方面是有效的。第4章通过建立“最小成本加净损失”模型来解决效率问题。使用来自称为Lindrith Project的杂草联盟的信息和一些模型输入,确定了几种在经济上有效的治疗策略,这些策略因一种情况而异。;本研究提供了直接且立即有用的政策输入,可用于设计联盟以实现有效,高效和成功的长期侵入性杂草管理,并有可能填补监管机构与执法部门之间的空白。但是,重要的是要记住,仅仅建立联盟并不能保证它可以随着时间的推移而发展,也不能保证它能够很好地解决入侵性问题。设计联盟的缺陷可能代价高昂,并可能导致不良结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Amatya, Pradyumna.;

  • 作者单位

    Utah State University.;

  • 授予单位 Utah State University.;
  • 学科 Economics Agricultural.;Agriculture Range Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 112 p.
  • 总页数 112
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号