首页> 外文学位 >Planning for a postmodern era: Storytelling, public participation, and the limits of ordinary democracy.
【24h】

Planning for a postmodern era: Storytelling, public participation, and the limits of ordinary democracy.

机译:规划后现代时代:讲故事,公众参与以及普通民主制度的局限性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Everyday assumptions about democracy and its limitations shape alternative public participation practices. This case study examines how participants in a multi-stakeholder city visioning process communicated to design a storytelling initiative with the aim of updating the city's general plan based on community values. By framing public participation as a discursive practice, this analysis shows how a variety of participant discourses shaped communication design in ways that enabled and constrained public interaction in meaningful ways. This study employs discourse tracing (LeGreco & Tracy, 2009) methods to analyze how subjects (re)produced and navigated a variety of discourses to understand, design, and enact storytelling and values-identification processes. A broad data set included: (a) meeting and event observation, (b) interviews, (c) resident stories, (d) newspaper and newsletter articles and editorials, (e) planning and policy documents, and (f) professional planning white papers and reports.;Findings show that an autonomous city narrative organized attention and activity within city boundaries and downplayed resident differences. Multiple discourses about the limitations of ordinary democracy (Tracy, 2010) and about the tensions between ordinary democracy and alternative participatory practices, opened up particular communication design possibilities, while closing off others. Over time, discourses about planning problems, ordinary democracy, and storytelling as research reinforced each other in a reticulated manner so that storytelling was understood in relationship to discursive accountability formations. This made it possible for group members to extract values from individual stories and produce aggregate city values that represented an abstracted form of citizen judgment.;Keywords: discursive, accountability, communication, planning, storytelling, values, public participation, policy, local government, ordinary democracy, community, discourse tracing
机译:关于民主及其局限性的日常假设影响着替代性的公众参与实践。本案例研究考察了多方利益相关者的城市愿景过程中的参与者如何交流以设计故事讲述计划,目的是根据社区价值更新城市的总体规划。通过将公众参与定义为一种话语实践,此分析显示了各种参与者话语如何以有意义的方式启用和限制公众互动的方式塑造了沟通设计。这项研究采用话语追踪(LeGreco和Tracy,2009)方法来分析主题如何(再现)并导航各种话语,以理解,设计和制定故事叙述和价值识别过程。广泛的数据集包括:(a)会议和活动观察,(b)访谈,(c)居民故事,(d)报纸和新闻通讯的文章和社论,(e)规划和政策文件以及(f)专业规划白研究结果表明,一个自治的城市叙事组织了城市边界内的注意力和活动,淡化了居民的差异。关于普通民主的局限性的多种论述(特雷西,2010年)以及关于普通民主与替代性参与实践之间的紧张关系,开辟了特殊的传播设计可能性,而封闭了其他可能性。随着时间的流逝,关于计划问题,普通民主和讲故事作为研究的论述以网状方式相互加强,因此讲故事被理解为与话语责任制相关。这样一来,小组成员就可以从单个故事中提取价值,并产生代表抽象形式的公民判断的城市总价值。关键字:话语,责任,沟通,规划,讲故事,价值,公众参与,政策,地方政府,普通民主,社区,话语追踪

著录项

  • 作者

    McClellan, Sara Elizabeth.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Colorado at Boulder.;

  • 授予单位 University of Colorado at Boulder.;
  • 学科 Speech Communication.;Urban and Regional Planning.;Sociology Public and Social Welfare.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 332 p.
  • 总页数 332
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号