首页> 外文学位 >Pages crossed: Tracing literary casualties in transwar Japan and the United States.
【24h】

Pages crossed: Tracing literary casualties in transwar Japan and the United States.

机译:跨页:追踪跨战日本和美国的文学伤亡情况。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study compares various modes of literary censorship in Japan and the United States from the 1920s to the 1960s under imperialism and democracy, employed by occupiers and inflicted on the occupied. Considered as a "minor literature," banned fiction and poetry serve not only as marginalized others to be catalogued and assimilated into the realm of the readable, but also as traces that suggest the contours of the unreadable and unwritable. Three broad themes destabilize notions of radically identifiable modes of suppression and enable my comparison: how the archivization of censorship reveals the explicit and implicit components of historical censors; how sedition and obscenity---the two major criteria for literary censorship during the period---were internalized and resisted by the censored; and how official state censorship forms a continuum with self-censorship, critical scorn, and canon formation. Drawing on an array of Japanese and American literary and historical sources---including collections of censors' examination copies, statistical analyses of book production and sales, literary manuscripts, trial records, and police reports---I propose that any study of marginal literatures must also recognize the continued construction and reconstruction of new margins by critical discourses. "Pages Crossed" argues the ethical necessity of reading the literary casualties left behind in the path of a violence to texts that transcends war and its political institutions.
机译:这项研究比较了日本和美国在1920到1960年代在帝国主义和民主制度下,占领者雇用并侵占占领者的情况下的各种文学审查模式。被禁止的小说和诗歌被认为是“未成年文学”,不仅被边缘化了,并被归类到可读性领域,还充当暗示不可读和不可写轮廓的痕迹。三个广泛的主题破坏了根本可识别的镇压模式的观念,使我无法进行比较:审查制度的存档如何揭示历史审查员的显性和隐性成分;审查制度是如何内化和抵制煽动和淫秽(这一时期文学审查的两个主要标准)的;以及官方的国家审查制度如何与自我审查制度,批判蔑视和规范形成连续性。我建议借鉴日本和美国的一系列文学和历史资料-包括检查员的检查本的收集,书籍生产和销售的统计分析,文学手稿,审判记录和警察报告-我建议对边际进行任何研究文献还必须认识到批判性话语对新边缘的不断建构和重构。 “ Pages Crossed”论述了从暴力到超越战争及其政治制度的文本暴力路径中留下的文学伤亡的伦理学必要性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Abel, Jonathan E.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton University.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton University.;
  • 学科 Literature Comparative.; Literature Asian.; Literature American.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 412 p.
  • 总页数 412
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 文学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号