首页> 外文学位 >Measuring the effectiveness of online faculty development: Exploring factors leading to the integration of universal design concepts by community college professors.
【24h】

Measuring the effectiveness of online faculty development: Exploring factors leading to the integration of universal design concepts by community college professors.

机译:衡量在线教师发展的有效性:探索导致社区大学教授整合通用设计概念的因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study is a quantitative analysis examining the effectiveness of delivering an online faculty development module about integrating materials and methods of instruction created according to universal design (UD) principles intended to effectively instruct a diverse range of students. The study focused on full-time, part-time, and adjunct professors employed as instructors at any of Virginia's 23 community colleges. The initial sample included 75 professors from across the state representing a wide range of disciplines, ages, and years of postsecondary teaching experience. Subjects completed an online faculty development module that introduced them to the concept of universal design and provided them with the context of how UD practices and applications will help to create an environment and materials to effectively instruct all learners regardless of their ethnic or cultural background, learning style, or disability. The module received a high effectiveness rating from those who completed it, most of whom were new to the idea of universal design. A majority of the participants reported that they would review their current instructional materials for UD characteristics and that they would seek out or create universally designed materials for instructional use.; Study participants who agreed to continue in the study to provide additional follow-up input beyond the module's completion were randomly selected for inclusion into either an experimental or control group. Experimental group members received supplemental materials (in the form of articles about applying UD concepts into their instruction) via email at predetermined points in the study. Members of the control group received no additional materials about universal design. At two predetermined points, all of the follow-up participants representing both groups were contacted by email to complete identical online follow-up questionnaires. The data gathered were analyzed and compared to determine if differences existed between the groups in how they applied the concepts of the initial module and to determine if the experimental group members demonstrated higher incidences of integrating universal design into their instruction. After careful examination of the data, no statistical significance was found between the rate of integration of UD concepts into the instruction of the groups in this study.
机译:这项研究是一项定量分析,检查了交付在线教师发展模块的有效性,该模块关于整合根据通用设计(UD)原理创建的材料和教学方法,旨在有效地指导各种学生。该研究主要针对弗吉尼亚州23所社区大学中任职的全职,兼职和兼职教授。最初的样本包括来自全州的75名教授,代表了不同学科,年龄和高中教学经验的年限。受试者完成了在线教师发展模块,向他们介绍了通用设计的概念,并向他们提供了UD做法和应用程序将如何帮助创建一个环境和材料以有效指导所有学习者的学习背景,而不论其种族或文化背景如何,风格或残障。该模块在完成该模块的人员中得到了很高的评价,其中大多数人对通用设计的想法是陌生的。大多数参与者报告说,他们将审查其当前有关UD特性的教学材料,并会寻找或创建通用设计的教学材料。同意继续参加研究以提供超出模块完成范围的其他后续输入的研究参与者,被随机选择纳入实验组或对照组。实验小组成员在研究的预定时间点通过电子邮件收到了补充材料(以关于将UD概念应用到其指导中的文章形式)。对照组的成员没有收到有关通用设计的其他材料。在两个预定点,通过电子邮件与代表两组的所有随访参与者进行联系,以完成相同的在线随访问卷。对收集到的数据进行分析和比较,以确定各组之间在应用初始模块概念方面是否存在差异,并确定实验组成员是否显示出将通用设计集成到其指令中的可能性更高。在仔细检查数据之后,在本研究中,将UD概念整合到各组的指导中的比率之间没有统计学意义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Finn, Donald E., Jr.;

  • 作者单位

    Virginia Commonwealth University.;

  • 授予单位 Virginia Commonwealth University.;
  • 学科 Education Community College.; Education Administration.; Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 168 p.
  • 总页数 168
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 高等教育;教育;高等教育;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号