首页> 外文学位 >Directing curriculum through standards: A content analysis of the 2010 Texas state social studies standards.
【24h】

Directing curriculum through standards: A content analysis of the 2010 Texas state social studies standards.

机译:通过标准指导课程:对2010年德克萨斯州社会研究标准的内容分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In 2010 the Texas Education Agency adopted newly rewritten curriculum standards for the state's social studies courses K-12. The period leading up to the adoption of the standards proved contentious as the new standards moved out of the writing committees and into the public realm. The issues brought forth from initial readings of the standards appeared in the national spotlight as educators and the general public from around the country voiced their concerns. Many concerns centered on the belief that the Texas State Board of Education had rewritten the standards to reflect a more politically conservative world view along with an emphasis on traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs. Members of the state board argued that the previous standards reflected a politically liberal world view and that the board needed to bring balance to the standards. Because of national criticism changes were made but on a limited scale.;The purpose of this study was to assess if the rewritten standards demonstrated a politically conservative preference as well as an emphasis on Judeo-Christian beliefs. During the analysis I included information regarding a preference for capitalism, a focus on Texas and U.S. history while minimizing world history and a focus on memorization rather than critical thinking.;The analysis revealed that the rewritten standards demonstrate a politically conservative leaning while promoting traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs. Analysis and research further revealed that the standards promote capitalism while limiting the study of other economic systems in the world. In regards to the preference for Texas and U.S. history versus world history my analysis confirmed a limited presence of world history; however, research also revealed that this issue is not limited to the state of Texas, but a number of other states in the U.S. Finally, my analysis demonstrated that many of the standards' objectives begin with verbs found on verb lists from Bloom's Taxonomy. By using Bloom's Taxonomy I learned that a majority of objectives throughout the K-12 standards operate in the lower half of the Taxonomy rather than the upper half meaning that there is an emphasis on lower order thinking skills rather than higher order thinking skills.
机译:2010年,得克萨斯州教育局采用了新改写的州社会研究课程K-12课程标准。随着新标准从写作委员会移至公共领域,导致采用标准的时期引起了争议。最初阅读标准所带来的问题在全国引起了人们的关注,来自全国各地的教育工作者和公众表达了他们的关注。许多担忧集中在这样一种信念上,即德克萨斯州教育委员会已经改写了标准,以反映出更加政治上保守的世界观,同时强调传统的犹太-基督教信仰。州议会议员辩称,以前的标准反映了政治上自由的世界观,而州议会需要平衡标准。由于受到了国家的批评,所以进行了更改,但是规模有限。本研究的目的是评估重新编写的标准是否显示出政治上的保守偏爱以及对犹太教-基督教信仰的重视。在分析过程中,我提供了有关偏爱资本主义,关注德克萨斯州和美国历史,同时将世界历史降至最低以及关注记忆而非批判性思维的信息;该分析表明,重新制定的标准在推广传统犹太教时表现出政治上的保守倾向-基督教信仰。分析和研究进一步表明,标准在促进资本主义的同时限制了对世界其他经济体系的研究。关于偏好德克萨斯州和美国历史还是世界历史,我的分析证实了世界历史的存在有限;但是,研究还表明,这个问题不仅限于德克萨斯州,还包括美国的其他多个州。最后,我的分析表明,许多标准的目标都是从Bloom的Taxonomy的动词列表中找到的动词开始的。通过使用Bloom的分类法,我了解到整个K-12标准中的大多数目标都在分类法的下半部分而不是上半部分中运行,这意味着着重于低级思维能力而不是高阶思维能力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Smith, Norman.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Arizona.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Arizona.;
  • 学科 Education Social Sciences.;Education Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 432 p.
  • 总页数 432
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号