This thesis is an attempt to articulate the ambiguity of the Hegel-Schelling relationship in Slavoj Zizek's work and gesture towards some critical problems it raises. Characterizing his own transcendental materialism again and again as Hegelian, never a Schellingian project, Zizek belies his overt reliance on texts such as Schelling's Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Human Freedom and the Ages of the World for the development of his own theory of the psychoanalytical subject. What I propose, therefore, is to read Zizek against Zizek in order to demonstrate the complex intwining of Schellingian ontology and Hegelian logic at the core of Zizek's own thinking.;Zizek turns to German Idealist tradition in order to give a nonreductive materialist account of the emergence of the psychoanalytical subject. In the end, however, his reactualization of German Idealism intensifies the conceptual paradoxes underlying Lacanian psychoanalysis, rather them solving them. Zizek's fusion of Schelling and Hegel points to a possibly fatal ambivalence in Lacan's conception of the Real: Is it that which precedes and exceeds consciousness, or a pure lack that only represents itself through the breakdowns of the Symbolic? I will argue that Zizek's hybridism of Schelling and Hegel is unable to resolve this issue and thus calls us to return to German Idealism to understand what is truly at stake in the Schelling-Hegel conflict.
展开▼
