首页> 外文学位 >Mainstreaming evaluation: Four case studies of systematic evaluation integrated into organizational culture and practices.
【24h】

Mainstreaming evaluation: Four case studies of systematic evaluation integrated into organizational culture and practices.

机译:主流评估:将四个系统评估案例研究整合到组织文化和实践中。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Following a literature review, a researcher generated a descriptive theory of evaluation mainstreaming, the integration of systematic evaluation into the culture, systems, and job responsibilities of organizations. She then explored the validity and generalizability of the theory in the National Science Foundation's grant-funded Advanced Technological Education Program using mixed methods research. Four centers were chosen based on quantitative survey responses which suggested that the organizations were likely to be mainstreaming evaluation. For each center, the researcher conducted a site visit, interviews, and document review to understand (i) the processes by and extent to which evaluation became part of everyday operations; (ii) the characteristics of the leaders and culture that made the integration of evaluation possible; and (iii) the organizational capabilities, systems, structures, and practices that have made evaluation sustainable, effective, and useful.;In this dissertation, the researcher presents the descriptive theory as well as the four individual case studies and cross-case analysis through which the theory was explored and refined. Key findings support the existence of three streams and six developmental stages of evaluation within organizations and the importance of (i) leaders who possess characteristics of personal vision and commitment to the truth about current reality; (ii) organizational culture in which staff and partners have shared vision and values; (iii) organizational capabilities such as prioritizing, strategic staffing, team functioning, and creating collaborative external partnerships to listen and learn; and (iv) organizational systems to acquire, analyze, disseminate, and utilize evaluative information. Specific evaluation practices of each center are also presented. Future research should test the descriptive theory of mainstreaming evaluation in broader organizational contexts.
机译:经过文献综述后,研究人员产生了一种描述性的评价主流化理论,即将系统评价整合到组织的文化,系统和工作职责中。然后,她使用混合方法研究,在国家科学基金会的拨款资助的高级技术教育计划中探索了该理论的有效性和普遍性。根据定量调查答复选择了四个中心,这表明这些组织可能正在将评估纳入主流。研究人员对每个中心进行了实地考察,访谈和文件审查,以了解(i)评估成为日常运营一部分的过程和程度; (ii)领导者的特点和文化使评估的整合成为可能; (iii)使评估具有可持续性,有效性和有用性的组织能力,系统,结构和实践。在本文中,研究人员通过以下方式介绍了描述性理论以及四个案例研究和跨案例分析对该理论进行了探索和完善。主要发现支持组织内部评估的三个流向和六个发展阶段的存在,以及(i)具有个人视野特征和对当前现实真相的承诺的领导人的重要性; (ii)员工和合作伙伴拥有共同愿景和价值观的组织文化; (iii)组织能力,例如确定优先次序,战略人员配备,团队职能以及建立协作性外部伙伴关系以进行倾听和学习; (iv)获取,分析,传播和利用评估信息的组织系统。还介绍了每个中心的具体评估做法。未来的研究应该在更广泛的组织环境中测试主流化评估的描述性理论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gullickson, Amy M.;

  • 作者单位

    Western Michigan University.;

  • 授予单位 Western Michigan University.;
  • 学科 Sociology Organization Theory.;Education Evaluation.;Sociology Organizational.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 664 p.
  • 总页数 664
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号