首页> 外文学位 >Taking the (International) Rule of Law Seriously: Legality and legitimacy in United Nations ad hoc commissions of inquiry.
【24h】

Taking the (International) Rule of Law Seriously: Legality and legitimacy in United Nations ad hoc commissions of inquiry.

机译:认真对待(国际)法治:联合国特设调查委员会的合法性和合法性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Contemporary ad hoc United Nations Commissions of Inquiry (UN COIs) operate during or in the aftermath of many of the world's worst conflicts. Over the years they have met with mixed success, and a good deal of criticism, yet are thought to provide a vital and unique benefit. Today, that benefit is seen either as the promotion of accountability for criminal wrongdoing, where quasi-criminal inquiries investigate whether war crimes, crimes against humanity, or genocide has taken place; or, it is seen as laying the foundation for transitional justice reforms, whereby UN COIs map the social, political, legal and even economic landscape and provide "holistic" transitional justice recommendations. Yet despite these lofty goals and the perceived importance of UN COIs, there is very little research on UN COIs. That which does exist tends not to question their purposes or seriously interrogate their procedures; instead, it focuses on incremental measures to improve UN COIs' processes and legal analyses. This dissertation seeks to provide the basis of a theoretical, principled approach to the creation and work of UN COIs, a normative platform upon which human rights monitoring methods can expand and a continuity of investigatory practice can develop. By treating UN COIs as legal bodies with legal obligations, this dissertation draws on Fuller's conception of legality and the theory of "interactional law-making" to question the very purposes for which UN COIs are seen to exist and the procedures by which they operate. It finds that neither the holistic transitional justice purpose nor the quasi- criminal purpose is legally or practically tenable. Instead, UN COIs should operate as post-conflict bodies, and delve deeply into a relatively narrow aspect of a systemic problem. A commitment to legality and interactional law-making can also offer a curative to the most salient criticisms of UN COI procedures by improving the credibility, reliability, and impartiality -- the legitimacy -- of their operations and how they are created.
机译:当代联合国特设调查委员会(UN COI)在世界上许多最严重的冲突期间或之后开展工作。多年来,他们取得了不同的成功,并受到了很多批评,但被认为可以提供至关重要的独特利益。如今,这种好处被视为是促进了对犯罪不法行为的追究,在那里,准犯罪调查会调查是否发生过战争罪,危害人类罪或灭绝种族罪;或者,它被视为为过渡司法改革奠定了基础,据此,联合国COI可以绘制社会,政治,法律甚至经济形势的地图,并提供“整体”过渡司法建议。尽管有这些崇高的目标以及联合国利益冲突的重要性,但有关联合国利益冲突的研究却很少。确实存在的趋势往往不会质疑其目的或认真审视其程序;相反,它侧重于改进联合国COI流程和法律分析的渐进措施。本文旨在为联合国利益冲突组织的建立和工作提供理论,原则上的基础,为人权监测方法的扩展和发展侦查实践的连续性提供一个规范性平台。通过将联合国利益冲突组织作为具有法律义务的法人,本文借鉴了富勒的合法性概念和“互动立法”理论,质疑联合国利益冲突组织存在的目的和运作程序。它发现,整体的过渡司法目的和准犯罪目的在法律上或实践上都不成立。相反,联合国利益冲突组织应作为冲突后机构运作,并深入研究系统性问题的一个相对狭窄的方面。对合法性和互动性立法的承诺还可以通过提高其运营及其创建方式的可信度,可靠性和公正性(合法性),对联合国COI程序的最明显批评提供治疗。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nesbitt, Michael.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 International law.;Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 312 p.
  • 总页数 312
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:13

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号